[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$apiParty6fBuHLCPZ1LTYs42XHdVbjpSDOYYPYzyxeAGwSN5Tp8":3,"$apiPartyplbM811fsLjQXNAutLIqf0bBXwZ51k-OtoLdjXNT3UM":563,"$apiPartyplbM811fsLjQXNAutLIqf0bBXwZ51k-OtoLdjXNT3UM$H93EERW16b":563},{"product_data":4,"scene_data":21,"task_data":407,"modality_data":441,"domain_data":478},[5,9,12,15,18],{"name":6,"value":7,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Rivo","1","",{"name":10,"value":11,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Cubo","2",{"name":13,"value":14,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Moye","3",{"name":16,"value":17,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Juro","4",{"name":19,"value":20,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Ordo","5",[22,73,135,197,232,267,302,337,372],{"name":23,"value":7,"add_value":24,"describe":25,"children":26},"Home & Indoor","sofa","AI enhances everyday home life. Our datasets cover real indoor scenes to support smart devices, robotics, and home intelligence.",[27,29,31,33,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70],{"name":28,"value":7},"Living Room",{"name":30,"value":11},"Bedroom",{"name":32,"value":14},"Kitchen",{"name":34,"value":17},"Dining Area",{"name":36,"value":20},"Bathroom",{"name":38,"value":39},"Entrance \u002F Foyer","6",{"name":41,"value":42},"Corridor \u002F Hallway","7",{"name":44,"value":45},"Staircase","8",{"name":47,"value":48},"Home Office","9",{"name":50,"value":51},"Hobby \u002F Game Room","10",{"name":53,"value":54},"Worship Space","11",{"name":56,"value":57},"Garage","12",{"name":59,"value":60},"Utility \u002F Laundry Room","13",{"name":62,"value":63},"Pantry","14",{"name":65,"value":66},"Basement","15",{"name":68,"value":69},"Garden","16",{"name":71,"value":72},"Balcony","17",{"name":74,"value":11,"add_value":75,"describe":76,"children":77},"Office & Educational","workshop","AI is reshaping work and learning. Our datasets capture offices and classrooms to power automation and next-generation productivity tools.",[78,81,84,87,90,93,96,99,102,105,108,111,114,117,120,123,126,129,132],{"name":79,"value":80},"Open Office","18",{"name":82,"value":83},"Private Office","19",{"name":85,"value":86},"Co-working Space","20",{"name":88,"value":89},"Reception \u002F Lobby","21",{"name":91,"value":92},"Conference Room","22",{"name":94,"value":95},"Huddle Room \u002F Booth","23",{"name":97,"value":98},"Lecture Hall \u002F Auditorium","24",{"name":100,"value":101},"Classroom","25",{"name":103,"value":104},"Science Laboratory","26",{"name":106,"value":107},"Library","27",{"name":109,"value":110},"Design Studio","28",{"name":112,"value":113},"Pantry \u002F Breakroom","29",{"name":115,"value":116},"Cafeteria \u002F Canteen","30",{"name":118,"value":119},"Restroom (Commercial)","31",{"name":121,"value":122},"Gymnasium \u002F Sports Hall","32",{"name":124,"value":125},"Server Room","33",{"name":127,"value":128},"Mailroom \u002F Logistics","34",{"name":130,"value":131},"Janitorial Closet","35",{"name":133,"value":134},"Corridor \u002F Elevators","36",{"name":136,"value":14,"add_value":137,"describe":138,"children":139},"Healthcare & Medical","love-and-help","AI is advancing modern healthcare. Our datasets include clinics and hospitals to enable clinical insights and medical automation.",[140,143,146,149,152,155,158,161,164,167,170,173,176,179,182,185,188,191,194],{"name":141,"value":142},"Operating Theatre \u002F OR","37",{"name":144,"value":145},"Consultation Room","38",{"name":147,"value":148},"Treatment Room","39",{"name":150,"value":151},"Dental Clinic","40",{"name":153,"value":154},"Inpatient Ward","41",{"name":156,"value":157},"Nurse Station","42",{"name":159,"value":160},"ICU","43",{"name":162,"value":163},"NICU (Neonatal ICU)","44",{"name":165,"value":166},"Emergency Room (ER)","45",{"name":168,"value":169},"Hospital Corridor","46",{"name":171,"value":172},"Waiting Area","47",{"name":174,"value":175},"CT\u002FMRI","48",{"name":177,"value":178},"Medical Laboratory","49",{"name":180,"value":181},"Phlebotomy Room","50",{"name":183,"value":184},"Rehabilitation Gym","51",{"name":186,"value":187},"Assisted Living Room","52",{"name":189,"value":190},"Pharmacy","53",{"name":192,"value":193},"Sterile Processing Dept","54",{"name":195,"value":196},"Medical Storage","55",{"name":198,"value":17,"add_value":199,"describe":200,"children":201},"Business & Public Service","business","AI is elevating commercial and public services. Our datasets span retail, dining, and service centers to improve intelligent operations.",[202,205,208,211,214,217,220,223,226,229],{"name":203,"value":204},"Shopping Mall Atrium","86",{"name":206,"value":207},"Supermarket Shelf","87",{"name":209,"value":210},"Self-Checkout Counter","88",{"name":212,"value":213},"Restaurant Dining Hall","89",{"name":215,"value":216},"Commercial Kitchen","90",{"name":218,"value":219},"Hotel Lobby","91",{"name":221,"value":222},"Subway Platform","92",{"name":224,"value":225},"Security Checkpoint","93",{"name":227,"value":228},"Underground Parking","94",{"name":230,"value":231},"Bank Teller Zone","95",{"name":233,"value":20,"add_value":234,"describe":235,"children":236},"Industrial & Manufacturing","robot-arm","AI is modernizing industry. Our datasets capture factories and logistics spaces to support robotics and intelligent manufacturing.",[237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264],{"name":238,"value":239},"Final Assembly Line","96",{"name":241,"value":242},"Quality Control Station","97",{"name":244,"value":245},"Robotic Welding Cell","98",{"name":247,"value":248},"CNC Machining Center","99",{"name":250,"value":251},"Cleanroom","100",{"name":253,"value":254},"Automated Warehouse","101",{"name":256,"value":257},"Loading Dock","102",{"name":259,"value":260},"Sorting Center","103",{"name":262,"value":263},"Chemical Plant","104",{"name":265,"value":266},"Power Substation","105",{"name":268,"value":39,"add_value":269,"describe":270,"children":271},"Transportation & Driving","car","AI is revolutionizing mobility. Our datasets capture road networks, vehicle dynamics and traffic scenarios to support autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems.",[272,275,278,281,284,287,290,293,296,299],{"name":273,"value":274},"Urban Intersection","56",{"name":276,"value":277},"Highway \u002F Expressway","57",{"name":279,"value":280},"Tunnel","58",{"name":282,"value":283},"Roundabout","59",{"name":285,"value":286},"School \u002F Hospital Zone","60",{"name":288,"value":289},"Toll Station","61",{"name":291,"value":292},"Construction Zone","62",{"name":294,"value":295},"Parking Garage","63",{"name":297,"value":298},"Driver Cabin","64",{"name":300,"value":301},"Adverse Weather","65",{"name":303,"value":42,"add_value":304,"describe":305,"children":306},"Outdoor & Construction","tent-tree","AI is optimizing outdoor operations. Our datasets capture construction sites, open-air work zones and outdoor infrastructure to support smart construction and autonomous outdoor machinery.",[307,310,313,316,319,322,325,328,331,334],{"name":308,"value":309},"Excavation Site","66",{"name":311,"value":312},"Scaffolding Area","67",{"name":314,"value":315},"Material Storage Yard","68",{"name":317,"value":318},"Site Entrance","69",{"name":320,"value":321},"Roadwork Zone","70",{"name":323,"value":324},"Bridge Infrastructure","71",{"name":326,"value":327},"Transmission Line","72",{"name":329,"value":330},"Open-pit Mine","73",{"name":332,"value":333},"Tunneling Site","74",{"name":335,"value":336},"Post-Disaster Rubble","75",{"name":338,"value":45,"add_value":339,"describe":340,"children":341},"Nature, Aerial & Aquatic","global-loop","AI is exploring the natural world. Our datasets capture terrestrial landscapes, aerial vistas and aquatic ecosystems to support environmental monitoring and autonomous exploration systems.",[342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369],{"name":343,"value":344},"Deep Forest","76",{"name":346,"value":347},"Farmland \u002F Crops","77",{"name":349,"value":350},"River \u002F Lake","78",{"name":352,"value":353},"Open Ocean","79",{"name":355,"value":356},"Underwater Coral Reef","80",{"name":358,"value":359},"Fish Farm","81",{"name":361,"value":362},"Mountain Terrain","82",{"name":364,"value":365},"Urban Low Altitude","83",{"name":367,"value":368},"Fire Scene","84",{"name":370,"value":371},"Desert \u002F Gobi","85",{"name":373,"value":48,"add_value":374,"describe":375,"children":376},"Virtul & Digital","siri","AI is reshaping the virtual realm. Our datasets capture digital twins, virtual environments and simulated spaces to support metaverse development and intelligent digital interaction.",[377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404],{"name":378,"value":379},"VR Social Space","106",{"name":381,"value":382},"Synthetic Driving Sim","107",{"name":384,"value":385},"Digital Twin City","108",{"name":387,"value":388},"FPS \u002F MOBA Game","109",{"name":390,"value":391},"Robotics Gym","110",{"name":393,"value":394},"AR Navigation","111",{"name":396,"value":397},"Virtual Showroom","112",{"name":399,"value":400},"Code \u002F IDE Interface","113",{"name":402,"value":403},"App GUI Screen","114",{"name":405,"value":406},"Synthetic Face\u002FID","115",[408,411,414,417,420,423,426,429,432,435,438],{"name":409,"value":7,"add_value":410,"describe":8},"Classification","rubric",{"name":412,"value":11,"add_value":413,"describe":8},"Detection","radar",{"name":415,"value":14,"add_value":416,"describe":8},"Segmentation","segmentation",{"name":418,"value":17,"add_value":419,"describe":8},"Tacking","crosshairs",{"name":421,"value":20,"add_value":422,"describe":8},"Estimation","streamline",{"name":424,"value":39,"add_value":425,"describe":8},"QA","qa",{"name":427,"value":42,"add_value":428,"describe":8},"Recognition","finger-scan",{"name":430,"value":45,"add_value":431,"describe":8},"Control","control",{"name":433,"value":48,"add_value":434,"describe":8},"Extraction","extraction",{"name":436,"value":51,"add_value":437,"describe":8},"Retrieval","retrieval",{"name":439,"value":54,"add_value":440,"describe":8},"Forecast","forecast",[442,445,448,451,454,457,460,463,466,469,472,475],{"name":443,"value":7,"add_value":444,"describe":8},"Audio","audio",{"name":446,"value":11,"add_value":447,"describe":8},"Image","image",{"name":449,"value":14,"add_value":450,"describe":8},"Text","text",{"name":452,"value":17,"add_value":453,"describe":8},"Video","video",{"name":455,"value":20,"add_value":456,"describe":8},"Multi","multi",{"name":458,"value":39,"add_value":459,"describe":8},"Document","document",{"name":461,"value":42,"add_value":462,"describe":8},"Time-Series","time-series",{"name":464,"value":45,"add_value":465,"describe":8},"3D cloud","cloud",{"name":467,"value":48,"add_value":468,"describe":8},"Code","code",{"name":470,"value":51,"add_value":471,"describe":8},"Event","event",{"name":473,"value":54,"add_value":474,"describe":8},"Motion","motion",{"name":476,"value":57,"add_value":477,"describe":8},"Interaction","interaction",[479,482,487,491,494,499,504,509,514,519,524,528,532,536,540,544,548,552,556,559],{"id":480,"value":480,"name":233,"intro":481,"add_value":234,"describe":481},2,"智能质检：利用图像识别、多模态模型对产品外观或声音、振动等数据进行分析，自动识别缺陷，提高质量控制效率。\n工业知识问答与文档理解：通过大模型理解和总结技术文档、操作手册，实现快速问答、知识检索和培训支持。\n安全监测与风险预警：实时分析视频、传感器和操作日志，识别潜在危险行为或异常状态，提前预警，保障人员和设备安全。",{"id":483,"value":483,"name":484,"intro":485,"add_value":486,"describe":485},3,"Finance & Insurance","风险评估与预测：分析大量客户数据，评估信用风险、市场风险等，预测违约概率、股价走势等，辅助金融机构决策。\n智能投顾：根据客户风险偏好、资产状况等，提供个性化投资组合建议，实时调整投资策略。\n反欺诈检测：通过分析交易数据、用户行为，识别异常交易和欺诈行为，保障金融安全。","funds",{"id":488,"value":488,"name":489,"intro":490,"add_value":269,"describe":490},1,"Transport & Automotive","智能座舱：打造多模态交互的 AI 座舱，通过语音、手势、面部识别等实现人机交互，如语音控制导航、音乐播放。\n驾驶员状态监测：识别疲劳、分心、抽烟、打电话等行为，通过大模型判断危险等级，触发相应提醒或干预机制。\n智能驾驶：AI 用于环境感知、路径规划与决策控制，使车辆能识别道路、行人、障碍物等，实现自适应巡航、自动泊车、车道保持等功能，提升驾驶安全性与便利性。",{"id":492,"value":492,"name":136,"intro":493,"add_value":137,"describe":493},4,"医学影像诊断：分析 CT、MRI 等影像，辅助医生检测疾病、识别病灶，如 AI 系统可快速发现肺部结节。\n医患对话助手：通过自然语言处理理解患者问题，提供初步健康建议或就诊指导，缓解医生接诊压力。\n智能健康管理：根据用户健康数据，提供个性化健康建议、疾病预警，如智能手环结合 AI 分析用户运动、睡眠、心率等数据。",{"id":495,"value":495,"name":496,"intro":497,"add_value":498,"describe":497},6,"Smart Devices","多模态交互：支持语音、手势、眼神等多种交互方式，如 AI 眼镜可通过语音指令实现翻译、搜索功能。\n智能感知与处理：使设备能感知环境、理解用户需求，如智能音箱根据环境噪音自动调节音量。\n个性化服务：根据用户使用习惯和偏好，提供个性化功能与服务，如智能手表为用户定制运动健身计划。","microscope",{"id":500,"value":500,"name":501,"intro":502,"add_value":503,"describe":502},8,"Law & Government","智能法律问答：面向公众或企业用户，提供合规、劳动法、婚姻继承、知识产权等常见法律问题的智能解答。\n合同审查与风险识别：利用大模型分析合同内容，识别潜在风险条款、漏洞或不合理约定，提升合同审核质量。\n法律知识图谱构建：自动梳理法规、案例、条文之间的引用关系，构建语义化知识图谱，支持智能分析和推理。","hammer",{"id":505,"value":505,"name":506,"intro":507,"add_value":508,"describe":507},7,"Education & Training","个性化学习：根据学生学习进度、能力和知识掌握情况，推送个性化学习内容与练习，如智能辅导系统为学生制定专属学习计划。\n智能教学辅助：AI 助教协助教师进行作业批改、答疑解惑，还可分析教学数据，为教师提供教学反馈，优化教学方法。\n虚拟学习环境：利用 AI 创建虚拟实验、历史场景等，让学生沉浸式学习，如在虚拟化学实验室中进行实验操作。","degree-hat",{"id":510,"value":510,"name":511,"intro":512,"add_value":513,"describe":512},5,"Agriculture & Food","作物病虫害识别与防治：通过图像识别分析农作物叶片、果实等症状，识别病虫害类型，给出防治建议，减少产量损失。\n农产品质量检测：利用图像和传感器数据，识别果蔬等农产品的成熟度、外观缺陷，进行自动分级，提高市场竞争力。\n农情监测与预测：利用卫星遥感、气象和传感器数据，结合大模型预测作物长势、干旱、洪涝等农情变化。","ph-farm",{"id":515,"value":515,"name":516,"intro":517,"add_value":518,"describe":517},9,"Retail & E-commerce","智能客服：通过自然语言对话理解用户需求，提供产品推荐、订单查询、退换货支持等服务，提升客户满意度。\n个性化营销推荐：基于用户浏览、购买、偏好等行为数据，生成个性化推荐内容与优惠策略，提高转化率和客单价。\n商品内容生成：自动撰写商品标题、卖点描述、使用说明等内容，适用于海量SKU的内容生产与多语言发布。","buy",{"id":520,"value":520,"name":521,"intro":522,"add_value":523,"describe":8},10,"Security & Protection",null,"safe-shield-line",{"id":525,"value":525,"name":526,"intro":522,"add_value":527,"describe":8},11,"Environment & Climate","weather",{"id":529,"value":529,"name":530,"intro":522,"add_value":531,"describe":8},12,"Energy & Resource","energy-leaf",{"id":533,"value":533,"name":534,"intro":522,"add_value":535,"describe":8},13,"Express & Logistics","speed-outline",{"id":537,"value":537,"name":538,"intro":522,"add_value":539,"describe":8},15,"Sports","baseball-outline",{"id":541,"value":541,"name":542,"intro":522,"add_value":543,"describe":8},16,"General Data","daily-booth",{"id":545,"value":545,"name":546,"intro":522,"add_value":547,"describe":8},17,"Content & Media","media",{"id":549,"value":549,"name":550,"intro":522,"add_value":551,"describe":8},18,"Construction","construction",{"id":553,"value":553,"name":554,"intro":522,"add_value":555,"describe":8},19,"IT & Telecom","tech",{"id":557,"value":557,"name":558,"intro":522,"add_value":498,"describe":8},20,"Science & Research",{"id":560,"value":560,"name":561,"intro":522,"add_value":562,"describe":8},21,"Language & Culture","lang",{"id":564,"unique_code":565,"title":566,"icon":8,"intro":567,"cate":483,"detail":568,"create_time":569,"update_time":570,"price":571,"view_count":525,"download_count":572,"unit":572,"amount":573,"is_create_order":572,"enterprise_id":488,"seo_keywords":574,"seo_description":575,"data_format":576,"file_size":577,"apply_scene":578,"training_task":579,"version":580,"dataset_type_id":492,"dataset_scene_id":500,"sample_file":581,"banner":8,"unit_name":8,"cate_name":449,"icon_url":8,"banner_url":8,"sample_file_url":8,"data_dict":582,"qa_list":630,"sample_metadatas":647,"text_sample_content":690,"enterprise_name":691,"enterprise_logo":692,"data_distribution":693},1248,"a49507b90ee22fdbdf14f506e6448453","Patent Claim Amendment Basis Retrieval Dataset","Connect patent claim amendment questions to application evidence for more focused retrieval and examination response support.","\u003Cp>This dataset supports retrieval and legal argumentation concerning amendments to patent claims by linking claims, amendment explanations, examination opinions, and relevant text from application documents. Each sample organizes a natural language query, an analysis of the amendment, evidence passages and their supporting relationships, and summaries of the amendment basis, scope changes, and examination impact. It is designed for building and evaluating retrieval augmented generation systems for patent prosecution workflows. The data does not replace professional legal judgment; conclusions should be checked against the complete case record and applicable law.\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-15 18:06:49","2026-10-19 17:19:09","0.00",0,5000,"patent claim amendments,patent amendment basis retrieval,patent prosecution dataset,patent evidence passages,original disclosure scope review,patent legal text search,patent RAG dataset,patent application analysis","Links patent claim amendment questions to application evidence for basis retrieval, scope review, and retrieval augmented generation training in prosecution.","JSON","0.3GB","patent claim amendment review, patent application evidence retrieval, examination response support","legal evidence retrieval, claim-to-application matching, support evidence identification","V1.0","rivo\u002Fsample-packages\u002Fa444814b-a28f-4f0d-a788-f8cc83ced472\u002F20261015.zip",[583,588,593,598,604,610,615,620,625],{"id":572,"name":584,"field":585,"intro":586,"type":587},"File Name","file_name","File name","string",{"id":589,"name":590,"field":591,"intro":592,"type":587},9132,"Retrieval Query","retrieval_query","A natural language question about the basis, scope change, legality, or examination impact of a claim amendment.",{"id":594,"name":595,"field":596,"intro":597,"type":587},9133,"Retrieval Result Summary","retrieval_answer","A summary for patent examination response workflows covering the amendment basis, scope changes, examination impact, and key citation locations.",{"id":599,"name":600,"field":601,"intro":602,"type":603},9134,"Source Patent Materials","source_materials","Claims, amendment explanations, examination opinions, and relevant legal text from application documents that provide the basis for retrieval and analysis.","object",{"id":605,"name":606,"field":607,"intro":608,"type":609},9135,"Evidence Passage Mapping","evidence_segments","Original text passages relevant to the amendment or examination argument, along with their supporting relationships.","array",{"id":611,"name":612,"field":613,"intro":614,"type":603},9136,"Examination Impact Analysis","examination_impact","An analysis of how the amendment affects examination opinions, response strategy, and preparation of further evidence.",{"id":616,"name":617,"field":618,"intro":619,"type":609},9137,"Retrieval Keywords","retrieval_keywords","Keywords or phrases for retrieving similar cases, legal grounds, and evidence passages.",{"id":621,"name":622,"field":623,"intro":624,"type":603},9138,"Amendment Analysis","modification_analysis","An analysis of the amendment type, changed technical features, affected claims, and issues that require evidentiary support.",{"id":626,"name":627,"field":628,"intro":629,"type":603},9139,"Amendment Basis and Legality Assessment","legal_basis_assessment","An assessment, based on evidence passages, of whether the amendment has original support, exceeds the original disclosure, or is adequately reasoned.",[631,635,639,643],{"id":632,"question":633,"answer":634},6443,"What does the dataset contain?","Samples organize source patent materials, natural language retrieval queries, amendment analysis, evidence passage mappings, assessments of amendment basis and legality, examination impact, retrieval keywords, and result summaries.",{"id":636,"question":637,"answer":638},6444,"Which tasks is the dataset suitable for?","It supports evidence retrieval from patent legal texts, query to passage matching, amendment basis localization, and training or evaluation of retrieval augmented generation in patent prosecution workflows.",{"id":640,"question":641,"answer":642},6445,"How can I obtain the data, and how is it structured?","Check the current product page or data service channel for available versions and access options. Records are organized into structured fields; the product description and delivered version specify the applicable schema.",{"id":644,"question":645,"answer":646},6446,"Does the dataset provide legal advice or a specific license?","The data is intended for retrieval, training, and evaluation. It is not legal advice and does not replace review of the complete case record by a qualified patent professional. License scope, usage restrictions, and commercial use terms are defined by the relevant product page or license agreement.",[648,664,677],{"id":649,"relate_table":650,"relate_id":651,"file_size":572,"file_name":652,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":653,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":654,"cate_name":655,"retrieval_query":656,"retrieval_answer":657,"source_materials":658,"evidence_segments":659,"examination_impact":660,"retrieval_keywords":661,"modification_analysis":662,"legal_basis_assessment":663},15144,"union_cubo",976632446,"样例_3.json","json","{\"retrieval_query\": \"Further limiting the nano-silica particles in original Claim 1 to an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm: does it have direct support in the original application documents, and would it constitute new technical content or an amendment beyond scope?\", \"retrieval_answer\": \"The existing evidence can only prove that the original application discloses nano-silica particles and their wear-resistant effect, and cannot prove that the specific numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is directly disclosed in the original documents. Specification paragraph 0034 does not record this numerical value, and there is no corresponding example. Therefore, the current amendment lacks sufficient support and has a risk of amendment beyond scope. Before responding, the original application documents should be additionally checked; if there is no clearer original record, it is recommended to delete or revert this newly added numerical limitation.\", \"source_materials\": \"{\\\"original_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, nano-silica particles dispersed in the polymer matrix, and a curing agent. Claim 4: The wear-resistant coating composition according to Claim 1, wherein the mass fraction of the nano-silica particles is 5% to 15%.\\\", \\\"amended_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, and a curing agent.\\\", \\\"amendment_explanation\\\": \\\"To further limit the wear resistance of the coating, the nano-silica particles in Claim 1 are amended to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. The amendment explanation states that this particle size range is based on the record regarding nano-silica particles in specification paragraph 0034.\\\", \\\"office_action_text\\\": \\\"The office action points out that the original application documents only record the use of nano-silica particles and do not explicitly disclose the numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. Specification paragraph 0034 also does not provide the lower limit or upper limit of this numerical value. Writing this particle size range into Claim 1 may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application, and there is an issue of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"application_legal_text\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0034 records: nano-silica particles are uniformly dispersed in the polymer matrix to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the coating. The entire specification does not record an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, a particle size upper limit of 50 nm, or a specific example corresponding to this numerical range. Original Claim 1 only uses the general expression of nano-silica particles.\\\"}\", \"evidence_segments\": \"[{\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Original claim\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, nano-silica particles dispersed in the polymer matrix, and a curing agent.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Original Claim 1\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Supports nano-silica particles as a component of the composition, but does not support the specific numerical limitation of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.35, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": false, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The original claim only discloses the generic feature of nano-silica and does not provide a specific numerical value, range, or selection criterion for the average particle size.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Specification record\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Nano-silica particles are uniformly dispersed in the polymer matrix to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the coating.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0034\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Supports the use of nano-silica and its effect of improving hardness and wear resistance, but does not directly support the 50 nm particle size limit.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.25, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": false, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage explains the particle type, dispersion state, and technical effect, but does not record an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, nor does it establish a clear correspondence between this numerical value and the technical effect.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Office action\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The original application documents only record the use of nano-silica particles and do not explicitly disclose the numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm; writing this particle size range into Claim 1 may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Office action regarding amendment beyond scope\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Points out that the newly added particle size numerical range lacks original disclosure support and the possible risk of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.94, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage directly corresponds to the newly added numerical feature and indicates that the examiner has challenged it as new technical content.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Amendment explanation\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The nano-silica particles in Claim 1 are amended to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. The amendment explanation states that this particle size range is based on specification paragraph 0034.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Item 1 of the claim amendment explanation\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Confirms that the amendment adds a specific particle size range and the location of the support asserted by the applicant.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.72, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The amendment explanation accurately reflects the newly added numerical feature, but the specification paragraph 0034 to which it refers does not actually record the 50 nm numerical range, and therefore cannot alone remedy the lack of original support.\\\"}]\", \"examination_impact\": \"{\\\"office_action_issue\\\": \\\"The examiner considers that an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is not explicitly disclosed in the original application documents, and writing it into Claim 1 may constitute new technical content.\\\", \\\"impact_type\\\": \\\"Responding to beyond-scope concern\\\", \\\"impact_summary\\\": \\\"Although this amendment is intended to improve wear resistance and narrow the scope of protection through the particle size limitation, the existing original materials cannot support this specific numerical range, and therefore it may not overcome the objection of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"response_argument\\\": \\\"Before finding an explicit record of the 50 nm numerical range in the original claims, specification, or examples, it is not advisable to directly assert that the limitation has original support. Consider deleting this specific numerical value and restoring the originally disclosed expression of nano-silica, or using only a particle size range explicitly recorded in the original documents and directly determinable.\\\", \\\"requires_further_evidence\\\": true}\", \"retrieval_keywords\": \"[\\\"average particle size no greater than 50 nm\\\", \\\"original support for nano-silica\\\", \\\"amendment beyond scope of numerical range\\\", \\\"directly and unambiguously determined\\\", \\\"specification support\\\", \\\"newly added technical content\\\", \\\"claim numerical limitation\\\"]\", \"modification_analysis\": \"{\\\"modification_type\\\": \\\"Newly added technical feature\\\", \\\"change_summary\\\": \\\"The amendment adds, on the basis of the nano-silica particles in original Claim 1, a numerical limitation of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, but the original application documents only generally record nano-silica and do not disclose this specific particle size range.\\\", \\\"added_features\\\": [\\\"The average particle size of the silica particles is no greater than 50 nm\\\"], \\\"removed_features\\\": [\\\"The expression of nano-silica particles in original Claim 1 that does not limit a specific particle size\\\"], \\\"changed_features\\\": [\\\"Further limiting the nano-silica particles to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm\\\"], \\\"affected_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_issue\\\": \\\"It is necessary to prove whether an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is explicitly recorded in the original claims, specification, or examples, or whether it can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original disclosure; the existing materials show that this numerical range may lack original support.\\\"}\", \"legal_basis_assessment\": \"{\\\"basis_category\\\": \\\"Insufficient support\\\", \\\"legal_basis_summary\\\": \\\"The existing original materials only disclose nano-silica particles and their dispersion and wear-resistant effects, and do not disclose the specific numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, the selection basis, or a corresponding example; based on this, the newly added limitation cannot be found to have direct and unambiguous original support.\\\", \\\"amendment_scope_conclusion\\\": \\\"The amendment adds a specific particle size numerical range to the original generic technical feature and may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application. Although it formally narrows the particle range, narrowing the scope of protection does not automatically exclude the risk of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"support_sufficiency\\\": \\\"Insufficient\\\", \\\"unresolved_risk\\\": \\\"There is an obvious risk of amendment beyond scope; at the same time, there is no clear correspondence in the original documents between the 50 nm particle size and wear resistance, which may further raise issues of specification support and inaccurate citation in the amendment explanation.\\\", \\\"reasoning_chain\\\": \\\"Original Claim 1 only records nano-silica particles, and specification paragraph 0034 only explains that they are uniformly dispersed and help improve hardness and wear resistance, without providing the specific 50 nm limit, nor recording an example or parameter selection logic containing this limit. Although the amendment explanation asserts paragraph 0034 as support, that paragraph cannot directly support the newly added numerical range. Therefore, the current evidence is insufficient to prove that an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original application documents, and the amendment has a risk of being beyond scope.\\\"}\"}","文本","Further limiting the nano-silica particles in original Claim 1 to an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm: does it have direct support in the original application documents, and would it constitute new technical content or an amendment beyond scope?","The existing evidence can only prove that the original application discloses nano-silica particles and their wear-resistant effect, and cannot prove that the specific numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is directly disclosed in the original documents. Specification paragraph 0034 does not record this numerical value, and there is no corresponding example. Therefore, the current amendment lacks sufficient support and has a risk of amendment beyond scope. Before responding, the original application documents should be additionally checked; if there is no clearer original record, it is recommended to delete or revert this newly added numerical limitation.","{\"original_claim_text\": \"Claim 1: A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, nano-silica particles dispersed in the polymer matrix, and a curing agent. Claim 4: The wear-resistant coating composition according to Claim 1, wherein the mass fraction of the nano-silica particles is 5% to 15%.\", \"amended_claim_text\": \"Claim 1: A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, and a curing agent.\", \"amendment_explanation\": \"To further limit the wear resistance of the coating, the nano-silica particles in Claim 1 are amended to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. The amendment explanation states that this particle size range is based on the record regarding nano-silica particles in specification paragraph 0034.\", \"office_action_text\": \"The office action points out that the original application documents only record the use of nano-silica particles and do not explicitly disclose the numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. Specification paragraph 0034 also does not provide the lower limit or upper limit of this numerical value. Writing this particle size range into Claim 1 may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application, and there is an issue of amendment beyond scope.\", \"application_legal_text\": \"Specification paragraph 0034 records: nano-silica particles are uniformly dispersed in the polymer matrix to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the coating. The entire specification does not record an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, a particle size upper limit of 50 nm, or a specific example corresponding to this numerical range. Original Claim 1 only uses the general expression of nano-silica particles.\"}","[{\"evidence_type\": \"Original claim\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, nano-silica particles dispersed in the polymer matrix, and a curing agent.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Original Claim 1\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Supports nano-silica particles as a component of the composition, but does not support the specific numerical limitation of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.35, \"is_direct_support\": false, \"evidence_explanation\": \"The original claim only discloses the generic feature of nano-silica and does not provide a specific numerical value, range, or selection criterion for the average particle size.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Specification record\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"Nano-silica particles are uniformly dispersed in the polymer matrix to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the coating.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Specification paragraph 0034\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Supports the use of nano-silica and its effect of improving hardness and wear resistance, but does not directly support the 50 nm particle size limit.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.25, \"is_direct_support\": false, \"evidence_explanation\": \"This passage explains the particle type, dispersion state, and technical effect, but does not record an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, nor does it establish a clear correspondence between this numerical value and the technical effect.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Office action\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"The original application documents only record the use of nano-silica particles and do not explicitly disclose the numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm; writing this particle size range into Claim 1 may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Office action regarding amendment beyond scope\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Points out that the newly added particle size numerical range lacks original disclosure support and the possible risk of amendment beyond scope.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.94, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"This passage directly corresponds to the newly added numerical feature and indicates that the examiner has challenged it as new technical content.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Amendment explanation\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"The nano-silica particles in Claim 1 are amended to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. The amendment explanation states that this particle size range is based on specification paragraph 0034.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Item 1 of the claim amendment explanation\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Confirms that the amendment adds a specific particle size range and the location of the support asserted by the applicant.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.72, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"The amendment explanation accurately reflects the newly added numerical feature, but the specification paragraph 0034 to which it refers does not actually record the 50 nm numerical range, and therefore cannot alone remedy the lack of original support.\"}]","{\"office_action_issue\": \"The examiner considers that an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is not explicitly disclosed in the original application documents, and writing it into Claim 1 may constitute new technical content.\", \"impact_type\": \"Responding to beyond-scope concern\", \"impact_summary\": \"Although this amendment is intended to improve wear resistance and narrow the scope of protection through the particle size limitation, the existing original materials cannot support this specific numerical range, and therefore it may not overcome the objection of amendment beyond scope.\", \"response_argument\": \"Before finding an explicit record of the 50 nm numerical range in the original claims, specification, or examples, it is not advisable to directly assert that the limitation has original support. Consider deleting this specific numerical value and restoring the originally disclosed expression of nano-silica, or using only a particle size range explicitly recorded in the original documents and directly determinable.\", \"requires_further_evidence\": true}","[\"average particle size no greater than 50 nm\", \"original support for nano-silica\", \"amendment beyond scope of numerical range\", \"directly and unambiguously determined\", \"specification support\", \"newly added technical content\", \"claim numerical limitation\"]","{\"modification_type\": \"Newly added technical feature\", \"change_summary\": \"The amendment adds, on the basis of the nano-silica particles in original Claim 1, a numerical limitation of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, but the original application documents only generally record nano-silica and do not disclose this specific particle size range.\", \"added_features\": [\"The average particle size of the silica particles is no greater than 50 nm\"], \"removed_features\": [\"The expression of nano-silica particles in original Claim 1 that does not limit a specific particle size\"], \"changed_features\": [\"Further limiting the nano-silica particles to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm\"], \"affected_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_issue\": \"It is necessary to prove whether an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is explicitly recorded in the original claims, specification, or examples, or whether it can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original disclosure; the existing materials show that this numerical range may lack original support.\"}","{\"basis_category\": \"Insufficient support\", \"legal_basis_summary\": \"The existing original materials only disclose nano-silica particles and their dispersion and wear-resistant effects, and do not disclose the specific numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, the selection basis, or a corresponding example; based on this, the newly added limitation cannot be found to have direct and unambiguous original support.\", \"amendment_scope_conclusion\": \"The amendment adds a specific particle size numerical range to the original generic technical feature and may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application. Although it formally narrows the particle range, narrowing the scope of protection does not automatically exclude the risk of amendment beyond scope.\", \"support_sufficiency\": \"Insufficient\", \"unresolved_risk\": \"There is an obvious risk of amendment beyond scope; at the same time, there is no clear correspondence in the original documents between the 50 nm particle size and wear resistance, which may further raise issues of specification support and inaccurate citation in the amendment explanation.\", \"reasoning_chain\": \"Original Claim 1 only records nano-silica particles, and specification paragraph 0034 only explains that they are uniformly dispersed and help improve hardness and wear resistance, without providing the specific 50 nm limit, nor recording an example or parameter selection logic containing this limit. Although the amendment explanation asserts paragraph 0034 as support, that paragraph cannot directly support the newly added numerical range. Therefore, the current evidence is insufficient to prove that an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original application documents, and the amendment has a risk of being beyond scope.\"}",{"id":665,"relate_table":650,"relate_id":666,"file_size":572,"file_name":667,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":653,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":668,"cate_name":655,"retrieval_query":669,"retrieval_answer":670,"source_materials":671,"evidence_segments":672,"examination_impact":673,"retrieval_keywords":674,"modification_analysis":675,"legal_basis_assessment":676},15143,774509480,"样例_2.json","{\"retrieval_query\": \"Replacing continuous acquisition in Claim 1 with separate acquisition according to preset time windows: does it have support in the specification, and can it clarify the correspondence between the sampled data and the detection sections of the conveyor belt?\", \"retrieval_answer\": \"This amendment replaces the continuous acquisition of original Claim 1 with the preset time window acquisition of specification paragraph 0031, and supports the generation of the defect distribution map with the window-order processing logic of paragraph 0032. The amendment has clear original support and can clarify the correspondence between the sampled data and the detection sections of the conveyor belt; however, in the response, the disclosure scope of windowed acquisition should be explained carefully, and specific window parameters not recorded in the original application should be avoided.\", \"source_materials\": \"{\\\"original_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A visual inspection method for detecting surface defects of a conveyor belt, comprising: acquiring a reflected light image of the surface of the conveyor belt by a line-scan camera; continuously acquiring pixel grayscale values corresponding to the reflected light image, and generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values. Claim 2: The method according to Claim 1, wherein the sampling frequency of the line-scan camera is adjusted according to the running speed of the conveyor belt.\\\", \\\"amended_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A visual inspection method for detecting surface defects of a conveyor belt, comprising: acquiring a reflected light image of the surface of the conveyor belt by a line-scan camera; separately acquiring pixel grayscale values of the reflected light image within a plurality of preset time windows corresponding to the running direction of the conveyor belt, and generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values within each preset time window.\\\", \\\"amendment_explanation\\\": \\\"To make the correspondence between the acquisition process and the running state of the conveyor belt clearer, continuous acquisition in Claim 1 is replaced with separate acquisition within a plurality of preset time windows, and the dependent limitation regarding adjustment of the sampling frequency in Claim 2 is deleted. The amendment is based on the records in the specification regarding time-window sampling and generation of the defect distribution map.\\\", \\\"office_action_text\\\": \\\"The office action points out that continuous acquisition in Claim 1 lacks a clear time boundary and does not explain how the acquired data corresponds to the running position of the conveyor belt, resulting in an unclear scope of protection of the claim. The examiner also points out that the expression in Claim 2 regarding sampling frequency adjustment does not clarify the relationship between frequency adjustment and defect localization.\\\", \\\"application_legal_text\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0031 records: the line-scan camera acquires reflected light data according to preset time windows corresponding to the running speed of the conveyor belt, and each time window corresponds to a detection section of the surface of the conveyor belt. Specification paragraph 0032 records: the processor separately calculates the pixel grayscale values of each detection section and generates the defect distribution map in the order of the time windows.\\\"}\", \"evidence_segments\": \"[{\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Original claim\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Continuously acquiring pixel grayscale values corresponding to the reflected light image, and generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Original Claim 1\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Provides the original acquisition mode being replaced and the generation relationship of the defect distribution map.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.88, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage clarifies the continuous acquisition and defect distribution map generation in the original claim, but does not limit the time boundary of acquisition, which is exactly the clarity problem pointed out in the office action.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Specification record\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The line-scan camera acquires reflected light data according to preset time windows corresponding to the running speed of the conveyor belt, and each time window corresponds to a detection section of the surface of the conveyor belt.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0031\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Directly supports the preset time windows and their correspondence with the detection sections of the conveyor belt.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.98, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The specification explicitly records the setting manner of the sampling windows and their physical correspondence, and can directly support the amended windowed acquisition limitation.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Specification record\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The processor separately calculates the pixel grayscale values of each detection section and generates the defect distribution map in the order of the time windows.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0032\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Supports the processing logic of generating the defect distribution map according to the data of each window.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.97, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage directly associates the data acquired in each window with the defect distribution map generation process, supplementing the logical relationship between the data and the image result in the original claim.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Office action\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Continuous acquisition in Claim 1 lacks a clear time boundary and does not explain how the acquired data corresponds to the running position of the conveyor belt, resulting in an unclear scope of protection of the claim.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Office action regarding the clarity of Claim 1\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Clarifies the clarity defect targeted by this replacement.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.95, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The time boundary and running position correspondence problems pointed out in the office action can be clarified by the preset time window limitation in specification paragraph 0031.\\\"}]\", \"examination_impact\": \"{\\\"office_action_issue\\\": \\\"The examiner considers that continuous acquisition lacks a time boundary and cannot clarify the correspondence between the acquired data and the running position of the conveyor belt, resulting in Claim 1 being unclear.\\\", \\\"impact_type\\\": \\\"Clarifying technical meaning\\\", \\\"impact_summary\\\": \\\"Windowed acquisition clarifies the temporal organization of the sampled data and its corresponding detection sections of the conveyor belt, can directly respond to the unclear expression of continuous acquisition, and at the same time makes the basis for generating the defect distribution map clearer.\\\", \\\"response_argument\\\": \\\"It can be argued that the amendment does not add a new inspection purpose or processing result, but rather writes into the claim the embodiments already disclosed in specification paragraphs 0031 to 0032. Each preset time window corresponds to one detection section, and the pixel grayscale values of each window are used in time order to generate the defect distribution map, so a person skilled in the art can clearly understand the relationship among the acquired data, the conveyor belt position, and the defect distribution result.\\\", \\\"requires_further_evidence\\\": false}\", \"retrieval_keywords\": \"[\\\"clarity of continuous acquisition\\\", \\\"preset time window\\\", \\\"conveyor belt detection section\\\", \\\"line-scan camera sampling\\\", \\\"defect distribution map\\\", \\\"explicitly recorded in specification\\\", \\\"replacement of claim technical features\\\"]\", \"modification_analysis\": \"{\\\"modification_type\\\": \\\"Replacement of technical features\\\", \\\"change_summary\\\": \\\"The amendment replaces the unclear continuous acquisition in Claim 1 with separate acquisition according to a plurality of preset time windows, and deletes the sampling frequency adjustment limitation in original Claim 2 that is not retained, so that the sampled data clearly corresponds to the detection sections of the conveyor belt.\\\", \\\"added_features\\\": [\\\"separately acquiring pixel grayscale values of the reflected light image within a plurality of preset time windows corresponding to the running direction of the conveyor belt\\\", \\\"generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values within each preset time window\\\"], \\\"removed_features\\\": [\\\"continuously acquiring pixel grayscale values corresponding to the reflected light image\\\", \\\"the dependent limitation of adjusting the sampling frequency of the line-scan camera according to the running speed of the conveyor belt\\\"], \\\"changed_features\\\": [\\\"replacing continuous acquisition with separate acquisition within a plurality of preset time windows\\\", \\\"clearly associating the generation of the defect distribution map with the pixel grayscale values of each time window\\\"], \\\"affected_claim_numbers\\\": [1, 2], \\\"support_issue\\\": \\\"It is necessary to prove that the preset time windows, the correspondence with detection sections, and the generation of the defect distribution map by window are all explicitly recorded in the specification, and to determine whether the replacement merely clarifies and technically limits rather than introduces a new sampling mechanism.\\\"}\", \"legal_basis_assessment\": \"{\\\"basis_category\\\": \\\"Explicitly recorded in specification\\\", \\\"legal_basis_summary\\\": \\\"The preset time windows, the correspondence between the windows and the detection sections of the conveyor belt, and the generation of the defect distribution map in the order of the windows are all explicitly recorded in specification paragraphs 0031 to 0032, and have direct original support.\\\", \\\"amendment_scope_conclusion\\\": \\\"The amendment does not change the subject of the visual inspection method, nor does it introduce a sampling mechanism outside the specification; replacing the unclear continuous acquisition with specific time windows further limits the acquisition and processing manner, and overall makes the scope of protection clearer and somewhat narrower.\\\", \\\"support_sufficiency\\\": \\\"Substantially sufficient\\\", \\\"unresolved_risk\\\": \\\"If the specification does not specify the specific length or determination rule of the preset time windows, the examiner may still question the clarity of the window parameters or the degree of support by the specification; in the response, it should be avoided to assert that the specification discloses specific numerical values that are not actually recorded.\\\", \\\"reasoning_chain\\\": \\\"Original Claim 1 only records continuous acquisition, and the examiner considers that it lacks a time boundary and positional correspondence. Specification paragraph 0031 explicitly records acquisition according to preset time windows corresponding to the running speed of the conveyor belt, and specifies that each window corresponds to one detection section; paragraph 0032 further records generating the defect distribution map according to the data of each window. Therefore, replacing continuous acquisition with windowed acquisition has direct support in the specification and can clarify the relationship between the data and the detection sections. After deleting the sampling frequency adjustment limitation of Claim 2, it should still be ensured that amended Claim 1 fully covers the inspection process to be protected.\\\"}\"}","Replacing continuous acquisition in Claim 1 with separate acquisition according to preset time windows: does it have support in the specification, and can it clarify the correspondence between the sampled data and the detection sections of the conveyor belt?","This amendment replaces the continuous acquisition of original Claim 1 with the preset time window acquisition of specification paragraph 0031, and supports the generation of the defect distribution map with the window-order processing logic of paragraph 0032. The amendment has clear original support and can clarify the correspondence between the sampled data and the detection sections of the conveyor belt; however, in the response, the disclosure scope of windowed acquisition should be explained carefully, and specific window parameters not recorded in the original application should be avoided.","{\"original_claim_text\": \"Claim 1: A visual inspection method for detecting surface defects of a conveyor belt, comprising: acquiring a reflected light image of the surface of the conveyor belt by a line-scan camera; continuously acquiring pixel grayscale values corresponding to the reflected light image, and generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values. Claim 2: The method according to Claim 1, wherein the sampling frequency of the line-scan camera is adjusted according to the running speed of the conveyor belt.\", \"amended_claim_text\": \"Claim 1: A visual inspection method for detecting surface defects of a conveyor belt, comprising: acquiring a reflected light image of the surface of the conveyor belt by a line-scan camera; separately acquiring pixel grayscale values of the reflected light image within a plurality of preset time windows corresponding to the running direction of the conveyor belt, and generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values within each preset time window.\", \"amendment_explanation\": \"To make the correspondence between the acquisition process and the running state of the conveyor belt clearer, continuous acquisition in Claim 1 is replaced with separate acquisition within a plurality of preset time windows, and the dependent limitation regarding adjustment of the sampling frequency in Claim 2 is deleted. The amendment is based on the records in the specification regarding time-window sampling and generation of the defect distribution map.\", \"office_action_text\": \"The office action points out that continuous acquisition in Claim 1 lacks a clear time boundary and does not explain how the acquired data corresponds to the running position of the conveyor belt, resulting in an unclear scope of protection of the claim. The examiner also points out that the expression in Claim 2 regarding sampling frequency adjustment does not clarify the relationship between frequency adjustment and defect localization.\", \"application_legal_text\": \"Specification paragraph 0031 records: the line-scan camera acquires reflected light data according to preset time windows corresponding to the running speed of the conveyor belt, and each time window corresponds to a detection section of the surface of the conveyor belt. Specification paragraph 0032 records: the processor separately calculates the pixel grayscale values of each detection section and generates the defect distribution map in the order of the time windows.\"}","[{\"evidence_type\": \"Original claim\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"Continuously acquiring pixel grayscale values corresponding to the reflected light image, and generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Original Claim 1\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Provides the original acquisition mode being replaced and the generation relationship of the defect distribution map.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.88, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"This passage clarifies the continuous acquisition and defect distribution map generation in the original claim, but does not limit the time boundary of acquisition, which is exactly the clarity problem pointed out in the office action.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Specification record\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"The line-scan camera acquires reflected light data according to preset time windows corresponding to the running speed of the conveyor belt, and each time window corresponds to a detection section of the surface of the conveyor belt.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Specification paragraph 0031\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Directly supports the preset time windows and their correspondence with the detection sections of the conveyor belt.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.98, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"The specification explicitly records the setting manner of the sampling windows and their physical correspondence, and can directly support the amended windowed acquisition limitation.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Specification record\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"The processor separately calculates the pixel grayscale values of each detection section and generates the defect distribution map in the order of the time windows.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Specification paragraph 0032\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Supports the processing logic of generating the defect distribution map according to the data of each window.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.97, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"This passage directly associates the data acquired in each window with the defect distribution map generation process, supplementing the logical relationship between the data and the image result in the original claim.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Office action\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"Continuous acquisition in Claim 1 lacks a clear time boundary and does not explain how the acquired data corresponds to the running position of the conveyor belt, resulting in an unclear scope of protection of the claim.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Office action regarding the clarity of Claim 1\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Clarifies the clarity defect targeted by this replacement.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.95, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"The time boundary and running position correspondence problems pointed out in the office action can be clarified by the preset time window limitation in specification paragraph 0031.\"}]","{\"office_action_issue\": \"The examiner considers that continuous acquisition lacks a time boundary and cannot clarify the correspondence between the acquired data and the running position of the conveyor belt, resulting in Claim 1 being unclear.\", \"impact_type\": \"Clarifying technical meaning\", \"impact_summary\": \"Windowed acquisition clarifies the temporal organization of the sampled data and its corresponding detection sections of the conveyor belt, can directly respond to the unclear expression of continuous acquisition, and at the same time makes the basis for generating the defect distribution map clearer.\", \"response_argument\": \"It can be argued that the amendment does not add a new inspection purpose or processing result, but rather writes into the claim the embodiments already disclosed in specification paragraphs 0031 to 0032. Each preset time window corresponds to one detection section, and the pixel grayscale values of each window are used in time order to generate the defect distribution map, so a person skilled in the art can clearly understand the relationship among the acquired data, the conveyor belt position, and the defect distribution result.\", \"requires_further_evidence\": false}","[\"clarity of continuous acquisition\", \"preset time window\", \"conveyor belt detection section\", \"line-scan camera sampling\", \"defect distribution map\", \"explicitly recorded in specification\", \"replacement of claim technical features\"]","{\"modification_type\": \"Replacement of technical features\", \"change_summary\": \"The amendment replaces the unclear continuous acquisition in Claim 1 with separate acquisition according to a plurality of preset time windows, and deletes the sampling frequency adjustment limitation in original Claim 2 that is not retained, so that the sampled data clearly corresponds to the detection sections of the conveyor belt.\", \"added_features\": [\"separately acquiring pixel grayscale values of the reflected light image within a plurality of preset time windows corresponding to the running direction of the conveyor belt\", \"generating a defect distribution map according to the pixel grayscale values within each preset time window\"], \"removed_features\": [\"continuously acquiring pixel grayscale values corresponding to the reflected light image\", \"the dependent limitation of adjusting the sampling frequency of the line-scan camera according to the running speed of the conveyor belt\"], \"changed_features\": [\"replacing continuous acquisition with separate acquisition within a plurality of preset time windows\", \"clearly associating the generation of the defect distribution map with the pixel grayscale values of each time window\"], \"affected_claim_numbers\": [1, 2], \"support_issue\": \"It is necessary to prove that the preset time windows, the correspondence with detection sections, and the generation of the defect distribution map by window are all explicitly recorded in the specification, and to determine whether the replacement merely clarifies and technically limits rather than introduces a new sampling mechanism.\"}","{\"basis_category\": \"Explicitly recorded in specification\", \"legal_basis_summary\": \"The preset time windows, the correspondence between the windows and the detection sections of the conveyor belt, and the generation of the defect distribution map in the order of the windows are all explicitly recorded in specification paragraphs 0031 to 0032, and have direct original support.\", \"amendment_scope_conclusion\": \"The amendment does not change the subject of the visual inspection method, nor does it introduce a sampling mechanism outside the specification; replacing the unclear continuous acquisition with specific time windows further limits the acquisition and processing manner, and overall makes the scope of protection clearer and somewhat narrower.\", \"support_sufficiency\": \"Substantially sufficient\", \"unresolved_risk\": \"If the specification does not specify the specific length or determination rule of the preset time windows, the examiner may still question the clarity of the window parameters or the degree of support by the specification; in the response, it should be avoided to assert that the specification discloses specific numerical values that are not actually recorded.\", \"reasoning_chain\": \"Original Claim 1 only records continuous acquisition, and the examiner considers that it lacks a time boundary and positional correspondence. Specification paragraph 0031 explicitly records acquisition according to preset time windows corresponding to the running speed of the conveyor belt, and specifies that each window corresponds to one detection section; paragraph 0032 further records generating the defect distribution map according to the data of each window. Therefore, replacing continuous acquisition with windowed acquisition has direct support in the specification and can clarify the relationship between the data and the detection sections. After deleting the sampling frequency adjustment limitation of Claim 2, it should still be ensured that amended Claim 1 fully covers the inspection process to be protected.\"}",{"id":678,"relate_table":650,"relate_id":679,"file_size":572,"file_name":680,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":653,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":681,"cate_name":655,"retrieval_query":682,"retrieval_answer":683,"source_materials":684,"evidence_segments":685,"examination_impact":686,"retrieval_keywords":687,"modification_analysis":688,"legal_basis_assessment":689},15142,290972710,"样例_1.json","{\"retrieval_query\": \"Incorporating the sensor installation position and the condition of increasing the liquid cooling flow rate at high temperature from original Claim 3 into Claim 1: does it have support in the original application documents, does it narrow the scope of protection, and can it be used to respond to the inventiveness deficiency raised with respect to D1?\", \"retrieval_answer\": \"This amendment incorporates the sensor position and threshold flow control from original Claim 3 into Claim 1. Original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028 both provide direct support; the amendment does not introduce new technical content and narrows the scope of protection. When responding to the inventiveness objection, original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028 can be cited, focusing on demonstrating the differences of the above combined features relative to D1 and their technical effect of suppressing local temperature rise.\", \"source_materials\": \"{\\\"original_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A battery thermal management system, comprising a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor disposed in the battery pack, and a controller, wherein the controller controls the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit according to the temperature detected by the temperature sensor.\\\\nClaim 3: The battery thermal management system according to Claim 1, wherein the temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the controller increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit.\\\", \\\"amended_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A battery thermal management system, comprising a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and a controller; the controller controls the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit according to the temperature detected by the temperature sensor, and increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold.\\\", \\\"amendment_explanation\\\": \\\"To respond to the office action regarding lack of inventiveness of Claim 1, the specific installation position of the temperature sensor and the control condition of increasing the flow rate at high temperature from original Claim 3 are incorporated into Claim 1. The above limitations are respectively recorded in original Claim 3 and in the embodiments of the specification regarding temperature detection and flow rate adjustment.\\\", \\\"office_action_text\\\": \\\"The office action points out that prior art document D1 discloses a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor, and a controller, and that Claim 1 does not exhibit distinguishing technical features sufficient to produce an inventive effect relative to D1. The examiner also requires explanation of whether incorporating the limitations of a dependent claim into Claim 1 has original support.\\\", \\\"application_legal_text\\\": \\\"Original Claim 3 explicitly records: the temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit is increased. Specification paragraph 0028 records: arranging the sensor near the outermost battery cell can shorten the thermal response path; when the detected temperature exceeds a preset threshold, the controller increases the coolant flow rate to suppress local temperature rise.\\\"}\", \"evidence_segments\": \"[{\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Original claim\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The battery thermal management system according to Claim 1, wherein the temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the controller increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Original Claim 3\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Directly supports the two newly added limitations: the sensor installation position and increasing the liquid cooling flow rate when the temperature is higher than a preset threshold.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1, 3], \\\"support_strength\\\": 1.0, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"Amended Claim 1 adopts the technical features of original Claim 3 item by item, and original Claim 3 is the direct textual basis for the incorporated limitations.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Specification record\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Arranging the sensor near the outermost battery cell can shorten the thermal response path; when the detected temperature exceeds a preset threshold, the controller increases the coolant flow rate to suppress local temperature rise.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0028\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Supports the technical association between the sensor position and temperature-triggered flow adjustment and its technical effect.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.96, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The specification not only separately records the two technical features but also explains their combined relationship for improving thermal response and suppressing local temperature rise.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Office action\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Prior art document D1 discloses a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor, and a controller, and Claim 1 does not exhibit distinguishing technical features sufficient to produce an inventive effect relative to D1.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Office action regarding the inventiveness of Claim 1\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Clarifies the inventiveness examination issue that this amendment needs to address.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.92, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage indicates that the examiner focuses on the distinguishing technical features between existing Claim 1 and D1, and incorporating the limitations of original Claim 3 can serve as the argumentative basis for responding to the inventiveness objection.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Amendment explanation\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Incorporating the specific installation position of the temperature sensor and the control condition of increasing the flow rate at high temperature from original Claim 3 into Claim 1.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Item 1 of the claim amendment explanation\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Explains the amendment action and its correspondence to original Claim 3.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1, 3], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.9, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The amendment explanation corresponds to original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028, forming a complete chain of amendment support.\\\"}]\", \"examination_impact\": \"{\\\"office_action_issue\\\": \\\"D1 is considered to disclose the basic composition of a battery thermal management system, and the examiner questions that Claim 1 lacks distinguishing technical features and inventiveness.\\\", \\\"impact_type\\\": \\\"Responding to novelty or inventiveness objection\\\", \\\"impact_summary\\\": \\\"After incorporating the limitations of original Claim 3, Claim 1 adds a specific sensor position and temperature-triggered flow control, narrows the scope of protection, and provides a clear technical feature basis for distinguishing D1.\\\", \\\"response_argument\\\": \\\"It can be argued that amended Claim 1 is not an arbitrary combination, but rather limits the sensor position, temperature threshold, and flow adjustment relationship explicitly recorded in original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028 as an overall technical solution. This combination can shorten the thermal response path and suppress local temperature rise, and D1 at least does not provide the same positional relationship and control logic; therefore, inventiveness should be re-evaluated in light of the above distinguishing features and technical effects.\\\", \\\"requires_further_evidence\\\": false}\", \"retrieval_keywords\": \"[\\\"incorporating Claim 3 into Claim 1\\\", \\\"original support for temperature sensor installation position\\\", \\\"increasing liquid cooling flow rate at preset temperature threshold\\\", \\\"combination of dependent claims\\\", \\\"narrowing the scope of protection\\\", \\\"inventive distinguishing technical features\\\"]\", \"modification_analysis\": \"{\\\"modification_type\\\": \\\"Multiple modifications coexist\\\", \\\"change_summary\\\": \\\"This modification incorporates two technical limitations of original Claim 3 into independent Claim 1, and removes the need for original Claim 3 as a separate dependent level, so that the scope of protection of Claim 1 adds a specific sensor position and a temperature-triggered control condition.\\\", \\\"added_features\\\": [\\\"The temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell\\\", \\\"When the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the controller increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit\\\"], \\\"removed_features\\\": [\\\"The hierarchical expression of original Claim 3 as a separate dependent claim\\\"], \\\"changed_features\\\": [\\\"Incorporating the technical limitations of original Claim 3 into Claim 1\\\", \\\"The flow control of the controller is clarified from general temperature-related control to increasing the flow rate when the temperature is higher than a preset threshold\\\"], \\\"affected_claim_numbers\\\": [1, 3], \\\"support_issue\\\": \\\"It is necessary to prove that the sensor position and the temperature-triggered flow control incorporated into Claim 1 are both explicitly recorded in the original application documents, and to determine whether this combination narrows rather than expands the scope of protection of original Claim 1.\\\"}\", \"legal_basis_assessment\": \"{\\\"basis_category\\\": \\\"Recorded in original claims\\\", \\\"legal_basis_summary\\\": \\\"Both technical features incorporated into Claim 1 are fully recorded in original Claim 3, and specification paragraph 0028 further records their technical function and combined relationship, so there is clear support in the original application documents.\\\", \\\"amendment_scope_conclusion\\\": \\\"The amendment does not introduce new technical content, nor does it change the claim subject of a battery thermal management system; by incorporating additional limitations of a dependent claim into the independent claim, the scope of protection is further limited relative to original Claim 1 and overall constitutes a narrowing of the scope of protection.\\\", \\\"support_sufficiency\\\": \\\"Sufficient\\\", \\\"unresolved_risk\\\": \\\"In the inventiveness response, it is still necessary to specifically explain the technical effects and unexpectedness of the sensor position and threshold flow control relative to D1; merely proving that the amendment has original support does not automatically prove inventiveness.\\\", \\\"reasoning_chain\\\": \\\"Amended Claim 1 adds the limitations from original Claim 3 regarding the sensor position and temperature-triggered flow control. Original Claim 3 directly records the two features, and specification paragraph 0028 also records their technical functions of shortening the thermal response path and suppressing local temperature rise. Therefore, the amendment has original support, does not generate new technical content, and narrows the scope of protection by adding limitations. Regarding the inventiveness objection raised with respect to D1, the above combined features and their technical effects should be further distinguished from D1.\\\"}\"}","Incorporating the sensor installation position and the condition of increasing the liquid cooling flow rate at high temperature from original Claim 3 into Claim 1: does it have support in the original application documents, does it narrow the scope of protection, and can it be used to respond to the inventiveness deficiency raised with respect to D1?","This amendment incorporates the sensor position and threshold flow control from original Claim 3 into Claim 1. Original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028 both provide direct support; the amendment does not introduce new technical content and narrows the scope of protection. When responding to the inventiveness objection, original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028 can be cited, focusing on demonstrating the differences of the above combined features relative to D1 and their technical effect of suppressing local temperature rise.","{\"original_claim_text\": \"Claim 1: A battery thermal management system, comprising a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor disposed in the battery pack, and a controller, wherein the controller controls the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit according to the temperature detected by the temperature sensor.\\nClaim 3: The battery thermal management system according to Claim 1, wherein the temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the controller increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit.\", \"amended_claim_text\": \"Claim 1: A battery thermal management system, comprising a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and a controller; the controller controls the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit according to the temperature detected by the temperature sensor, and increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold.\", \"amendment_explanation\": \"To respond to the office action regarding lack of inventiveness of Claim 1, the specific installation position of the temperature sensor and the control condition of increasing the flow rate at high temperature from original Claim 3 are incorporated into Claim 1. The above limitations are respectively recorded in original Claim 3 and in the embodiments of the specification regarding temperature detection and flow rate adjustment.\", \"office_action_text\": \"The office action points out that prior art document D1 discloses a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor, and a controller, and that Claim 1 does not exhibit distinguishing technical features sufficient to produce an inventive effect relative to D1. The examiner also requires explanation of whether incorporating the limitations of a dependent claim into Claim 1 has original support.\", \"application_legal_text\": \"Original Claim 3 explicitly records: the temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit is increased. Specification paragraph 0028 records: arranging the sensor near the outermost battery cell can shorten the thermal response path; when the detected temperature exceeds a preset threshold, the controller increases the coolant flow rate to suppress local temperature rise.\"}","[{\"evidence_type\": \"Original claim\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"The battery thermal management system according to Claim 1, wherein the temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell, and when the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the controller increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Original Claim 3\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Directly supports the two newly added limitations: the sensor installation position and increasing the liquid cooling flow rate when the temperature is higher than a preset threshold.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1, 3], \"support_strength\": 1.0, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"Amended Claim 1 adopts the technical features of original Claim 3 item by item, and original Claim 3 is the direct textual basis for the incorporated limitations.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Specification record\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"Arranging the sensor near the outermost battery cell can shorten the thermal response path; when the detected temperature exceeds a preset threshold, the controller increases the coolant flow rate to suppress local temperature rise.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Specification paragraph 0028\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Supports the technical association between the sensor position and temperature-triggered flow adjustment and its technical effect.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.96, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"The specification not only separately records the two technical features but also explains their combined relationship for improving thermal response and suppressing local temperature rise.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Office action\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"Prior art document D1 discloses a battery pack, a liquid cooling circuit, a temperature sensor, and a controller, and Claim 1 does not exhibit distinguishing technical features sufficient to produce an inventive effect relative to D1.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Office action regarding the inventiveness of Claim 1\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Clarifies the inventiveness examination issue that this amendment needs to address.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1], \"support_strength\": 0.92, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"This passage indicates that the examiner focuses on the distinguishing technical features between existing Claim 1 and D1, and incorporating the limitations of original Claim 3 can serve as the argumentative basis for responding to the inventiveness objection.\"}, {\"evidence_type\": \"Amendment explanation\", \"evidence_excerpt\": \"Incorporating the specific installation position of the temperature sensor and the control condition of increasing the flow rate at high temperature from original Claim 3 into Claim 1.\", \"evidence_location\": \"Item 1 of the claim amendment explanation\", \"supports_aspect\": \"Explains the amendment action and its correspondence to original Claim 3.\", \"linked_claim_numbers\": [1, 3], \"support_strength\": 0.9, \"is_direct_support\": true, \"evidence_explanation\": \"The amendment explanation corresponds to original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028, forming a complete chain of amendment support.\"}]","{\"office_action_issue\": \"D1 is considered to disclose the basic composition of a battery thermal management system, and the examiner questions that Claim 1 lacks distinguishing technical features and inventiveness.\", \"impact_type\": \"Responding to novelty or inventiveness objection\", \"impact_summary\": \"After incorporating the limitations of original Claim 3, Claim 1 adds a specific sensor position and temperature-triggered flow control, narrows the scope of protection, and provides a clear technical feature basis for distinguishing D1.\", \"response_argument\": \"It can be argued that amended Claim 1 is not an arbitrary combination, but rather limits the sensor position, temperature threshold, and flow adjustment relationship explicitly recorded in original Claim 3 and specification paragraph 0028 as an overall technical solution. This combination can shorten the thermal response path and suppress local temperature rise, and D1 at least does not provide the same positional relationship and control logic; therefore, inventiveness should be re-evaluated in light of the above distinguishing features and technical effects.\", \"requires_further_evidence\": false}","[\"incorporating Claim 3 into Claim 1\", \"original support for temperature sensor installation position\", \"increasing liquid cooling flow rate at preset temperature threshold\", \"combination of dependent claims\", \"narrowing the scope of protection\", \"inventive distinguishing technical features\"]","{\"modification_type\": \"Multiple modifications coexist\", \"change_summary\": \"This modification incorporates two technical limitations of original Claim 3 into independent Claim 1, and removes the need for original Claim 3 as a separate dependent level, so that the scope of protection of Claim 1 adds a specific sensor position and a temperature-triggered control condition.\", \"added_features\": [\"The temperature sensor is disposed between an inner wall of the battery pack and an outermost battery cell\", \"When the detected temperature is higher than a preset threshold, the controller increases the flow rate of the liquid cooling circuit\"], \"removed_features\": [\"The hierarchical expression of original Claim 3 as a separate dependent claim\"], \"changed_features\": [\"Incorporating the technical limitations of original Claim 3 into Claim 1\", \"The flow control of the controller is clarified from general temperature-related control to increasing the flow rate when the temperature is higher than a preset threshold\"], \"affected_claim_numbers\": [1, 3], \"support_issue\": \"It is necessary to prove that the sensor position and the temperature-triggered flow control incorporated into Claim 1 are both explicitly recorded in the original application documents, and to determine whether this combination narrows rather than expands the scope of protection of original Claim 1.\"}","{\"basis_category\": \"Recorded in original claims\", \"legal_basis_summary\": \"Both technical features incorporated into Claim 1 are fully recorded in original Claim 3, and specification paragraph 0028 further records their technical function and combined relationship, so there is clear support in the original application documents.\", \"amendment_scope_conclusion\": \"The amendment does not introduce new technical content, nor does it change the claim subject of a battery thermal management system; by incorporating additional limitations of a dependent claim into the independent claim, the scope of protection is further limited relative to original Claim 1 and overall constitutes a narrowing of the scope of protection.\", \"support_sufficiency\": \"Sufficient\", \"unresolved_risk\": \"In the inventiveness response, it is still necessary to specifically explain the technical effects and unexpectedness of the sensor position and threshold flow control relative to D1; merely proving that the amendment has original support does not automatically prove inventiveness.\", \"reasoning_chain\": \"Amended Claim 1 adds the limitations from original Claim 3 regarding the sensor position and temperature-triggered flow control. Original Claim 3 directly records the two features, and specification paragraph 0028 also records their technical functions of shortening the thermal response path and suppressing local temperature rise. Therefore, the amendment has original support, does not generate new technical content, and narrows the scope of protection by adding limitations. Regarding the inventiveness objection raised with respect to D1, the above combined features and their technical effects should be further distinguished from D1.\"}","{\"retrieval_query\":\"Further limiting the nano-silica particles in original Claim 1 to an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm: does it have direct support in the original application documents, and would it constitute new technical content or an amendment beyond scope?\",\"retrieval_answer\":\"The existing evidence can only prove that the original application discloses nano-silica particles and their wear-resistant effect, and cannot prove that the specific numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is directly disclosed in the original documents. Specification paragraph 0034 does not record this numerical value, and there is no corresponding example. Therefore, the current amendment lacks sufficient support and has a risk of amendment beyond scope. Before responding, the original application documents should be additionally checked; if there is no clearer original record, it is recommended to delete or revert this newly added numerical limitation.\",\"source_materials\":\"{\\\"original_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, nano-silica particles dispersed in the polymer matrix, and a curing agent. Claim 4: The wear-resistant coating composition according to Claim 1, wherein the mass fraction of the nano-silica particles is 5% to 15%.\\\", \\\"amended_claim_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1: A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, and a curing agent.\\\", \\\"amendment_explanation\\\": \\\"To further limit the wear resistance of the coating, the nano-silica particles in Claim 1 are amended to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. The amendment explanation states that this particle size range is based on the record regarding nano-silica particles in specification paragraph 0034.\\\", \\\"office_action_text\\\": \\\"The office action points out that the original application documents only record the use of nano-silica particles and do not explicitly disclose the numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. Specification paragraph 0034 also does not provide the lower limit or upper limit of this numerical value. Writing this particle size range into Claim 1 may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application, and there is an issue of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"application_legal_text\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0034 records: nano-silica particles are uniformly dispersed in the polymer matrix to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the coating. The entire specification does not record an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, a particle size upper limit of 50 nm, or a specific example corresponding to this numerical range. Original Claim 1 only uses the general expression of nano-silica particles.\\\"}\",\"evidence_segments\":\"[{\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Original claim\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"A wear-resistant coating composition, comprising a polymer matrix, nano-silica particles dispersed in the polymer matrix, and a curing agent.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Original Claim 1\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Supports nano-silica particles as a component of the composition, but does not support the specific numerical limitation of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.35, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": false, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The original claim only discloses the generic feature of nano-silica and does not provide a specific numerical value, range, or selection criterion for the average particle size.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Specification record\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"Nano-silica particles are uniformly dispersed in the polymer matrix to improve the hardness and wear resistance of the coating.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Specification paragraph 0034\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Supports the use of nano-silica and its effect of improving hardness and wear resistance, but does not directly support the 50 nm particle size limit.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.25, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": false, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage explains the particle type, dispersion state, and technical effect, but does not record an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, nor does it establish a clear correspondence between this numerical value and the technical effect.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Office action\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The original application documents only record the use of nano-silica particles and do not explicitly disclose the numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm; writing this particle size range into Claim 1 may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Office action regarding amendment beyond scope\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Points out that the newly added particle size numerical range lacks original disclosure support and the possible risk of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.94, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"This passage directly corresponds to the newly added numerical feature and indicates that the examiner has challenged it as new technical content.\\\"}, {\\\"evidence_type\\\": \\\"Amendment explanation\\\", \\\"evidence_excerpt\\\": \\\"The nano-silica particles in Claim 1 are amended to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm. The amendment explanation states that this particle size range is based on specification paragraph 0034.\\\", \\\"evidence_location\\\": \\\"Item 1 of the claim amendment explanation\\\", \\\"supports_aspect\\\": \\\"Confirms that the amendment adds a specific particle size range and the location of the support asserted by the applicant.\\\", \\\"linked_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_strength\\\": 0.72, \\\"is_direct_support\\\": true, \\\"evidence_explanation\\\": \\\"The amendment explanation accurately reflects the newly added numerical feature, but the specification paragraph 0034 to which it refers does not actually record the 50 nm numerical range, and therefore cannot alone remedy the lack of original support.\\\"}]\",\"examination_impact\":\"{\\\"office_action_issue\\\": \\\"The examiner considers that an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is not explicitly disclosed in the original application documents, and writing it into Claim 1 may constitute new technical content.\\\", \\\"impact_type\\\": \\\"Responding to beyond-scope concern\\\", \\\"impact_summary\\\": \\\"Although this amendment is intended to improve wear resistance and narrow the scope of protection through the particle size limitation, the existing original materials cannot support this specific numerical range, and therefore it may not overcome the objection of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"response_argument\\\": \\\"Before finding an explicit record of the 50 nm numerical range in the original claims, specification, or examples, it is not advisable to directly assert that the limitation has original support. Consider deleting this specific numerical value and restoring the originally disclosed expression of nano-silica, or using only a particle size range explicitly recorded in the original documents and directly determinable.\\\", \\\"requires_further_evidence\\\": true}\",\"retrieval_keywords\":\"[\\\"average particle size no greater than 50 nm\\\", \\\"original support for nano-silica\\\", \\\"amendment beyond scope of numerical range\\\", \\\"directly and unambiguously determined\\\", \\\"specification support\\\", \\\"newly added technical content\\\", \\\"claim numerical limitation\\\"]\",\"modification_analysis\":\"{\\\"modification_type\\\": \\\"Newly added technical feature\\\", \\\"change_summary\\\": \\\"The amendment adds, on the basis of the nano-silica particles in original Claim 1, a numerical limitation of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, but the original application documents only generally record nano-silica and do not disclose this specific particle size range.\\\", \\\"added_features\\\": [\\\"The average particle size of the silica particles is no greater than 50 nm\\\"], \\\"removed_features\\\": [\\\"The expression of nano-silica particles in original Claim 1 that does not limit a specific particle size\\\"], \\\"changed_features\\\": [\\\"Further limiting the nano-silica particles to silica particles having an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm\\\"], \\\"affected_claim_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"support_issue\\\": \\\"It is necessary to prove whether an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm is explicitly recorded in the original claims, specification, or examples, or whether it can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original disclosure; the existing materials show that this numerical range may lack original support.\\\"}\",\"legal_basis_assessment\":\"{\\\"basis_category\\\": \\\"Insufficient support\\\", \\\"legal_basis_summary\\\": \\\"The existing original materials only disclose nano-silica particles and their dispersion and wear-resistant effects, and do not disclose the specific numerical range of an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm, the selection basis, or a corresponding example; based on this, the newly added limitation cannot be found to have direct and unambiguous original support.\\\", \\\"amendment_scope_conclusion\\\": \\\"The amendment adds a specific particle size numerical range to the original generic technical feature and may introduce technical content not disclosed in the original application. Although it formally narrows the particle range, narrowing the scope of protection does not automatically exclude the risk of amendment beyond scope.\\\", \\\"support_sufficiency\\\": \\\"Insufficient\\\", \\\"unresolved_risk\\\": \\\"There is an obvious risk of amendment beyond scope; at the same time, there is no clear correspondence in the original documents between the 50 nm particle size and wear resistance, which may further raise issues of specification support and inaccurate citation in the amendment explanation.\\\", \\\"reasoning_chain\\\": \\\"Original Claim 1 only records nano-silica particles, and specification paragraph 0034 only explains that they are uniformly dispersed and help improve hardness and wear resistance, without providing the specific 50 nm limit, nor recording an example or parameter selection logic containing this limit. Although the amendment explanation asserts paragraph 0034 as support, that paragraph cannot directly support the newly added numerical range. Therefore, the current evidence is insufficient to prove that an average particle size of no greater than 50 nm can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original application documents, and the amendment has a risk of being beyond scope.\\\"}\"}","MOBIUSI INC","https:\u002F\u002Fstatic.mobiusi.com\u002Fmobiwusi\u002F20250829\u002F7bf4ac62b4533e2b809998a6f1c5491e.png?Expires=1792463130&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tH8MQqhgeiAtrzCHrxM&Signature=v6Tr8jBrdm4s5wU1SnnyGsYg%2Bhw%3D&x-oss-process=image%2Fresize%2Cm_fill%2Cw_35%2Ch_35",[694,700],{"type":695,"title":696,"count_data":697},"bar","Length distribution",[698],{"name":699,"value":483},"1k lower",{"type":701,"title":702,"count_data":703},"pie","Language distribution",[704],{"name":705,"value":483},"English"]