[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$apiParty6fBuHLCPZ1LTYs42XHdVbjpSDOYYPYzyxeAGwSN5Tp8":3,"$apiPartyQVwaKd9F1TW1P7j0GhixD7N38qg4Sx8DXsTATmB3EqA":563,"$apiPartyQVwaKd9F1TW1P7j0GhixD7N38qg4Sx8DXsTATmB3EqA$H93EERW16b":563},{"product_data":4,"scene_data":21,"task_data":407,"modality_data":441,"domain_data":478},[5,9,12,15,18],{"name":6,"value":7,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Rivo","1","",{"name":10,"value":11,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Cubo","2",{"name":13,"value":14,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Moye","3",{"name":16,"value":17,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Juro","4",{"name":19,"value":20,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Ordo","5",[22,73,135,197,232,267,302,337,372],{"name":23,"value":7,"add_value":24,"describe":25,"children":26},"Home & Indoor","sofa","AI enhances everyday home life. Our datasets cover real indoor scenes to support smart devices, robotics, and home intelligence.",[27,29,31,33,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70],{"name":28,"value":7},"Living Room",{"name":30,"value":11},"Bedroom",{"name":32,"value":14},"Kitchen",{"name":34,"value":17},"Dining Area",{"name":36,"value":20},"Bathroom",{"name":38,"value":39},"Entrance \u002F Foyer","6",{"name":41,"value":42},"Corridor \u002F Hallway","7",{"name":44,"value":45},"Staircase","8",{"name":47,"value":48},"Home Office","9",{"name":50,"value":51},"Hobby \u002F Game Room","10",{"name":53,"value":54},"Worship Space","11",{"name":56,"value":57},"Garage","12",{"name":59,"value":60},"Utility \u002F Laundry Room","13",{"name":62,"value":63},"Pantry","14",{"name":65,"value":66},"Basement","15",{"name":68,"value":69},"Garden","16",{"name":71,"value":72},"Balcony","17",{"name":74,"value":11,"add_value":75,"describe":76,"children":77},"Office & Educational","workshop","AI is reshaping work and learning. Our datasets capture offices and classrooms to power automation and next-generation productivity tools.",[78,81,84,87,90,93,96,99,102,105,108,111,114,117,120,123,126,129,132],{"name":79,"value":80},"Open Office","18",{"name":82,"value":83},"Private Office","19",{"name":85,"value":86},"Co-working Space","20",{"name":88,"value":89},"Reception \u002F Lobby","21",{"name":91,"value":92},"Conference Room","22",{"name":94,"value":95},"Huddle Room \u002F Booth","23",{"name":97,"value":98},"Lecture Hall \u002F Auditorium","24",{"name":100,"value":101},"Classroom","25",{"name":103,"value":104},"Science Laboratory","26",{"name":106,"value":107},"Library","27",{"name":109,"value":110},"Design Studio","28",{"name":112,"value":113},"Pantry \u002F Breakroom","29",{"name":115,"value":116},"Cafeteria \u002F Canteen","30",{"name":118,"value":119},"Restroom (Commercial)","31",{"name":121,"value":122},"Gymnasium \u002F Sports Hall","32",{"name":124,"value":125},"Server Room","33",{"name":127,"value":128},"Mailroom \u002F Logistics","34",{"name":130,"value":131},"Janitorial Closet","35",{"name":133,"value":134},"Corridor \u002F Elevators","36",{"name":136,"value":14,"add_value":137,"describe":138,"children":139},"Healthcare & Medical","love-and-help","AI is advancing modern healthcare. Our datasets include clinics and hospitals to enable clinical insights and medical automation.",[140,143,146,149,152,155,158,161,164,167,170,173,176,179,182,185,188,191,194],{"name":141,"value":142},"Operating Theatre \u002F OR","37",{"name":144,"value":145},"Consultation Room","38",{"name":147,"value":148},"Treatment Room","39",{"name":150,"value":151},"Dental Clinic","40",{"name":153,"value":154},"Inpatient Ward","41",{"name":156,"value":157},"Nurse Station","42",{"name":159,"value":160},"ICU","43",{"name":162,"value":163},"NICU (Neonatal ICU)","44",{"name":165,"value":166},"Emergency Room (ER)","45",{"name":168,"value":169},"Hospital Corridor","46",{"name":171,"value":172},"Waiting Area","47",{"name":174,"value":175},"CT\u002FMRI","48",{"name":177,"value":178},"Medical Laboratory","49",{"name":180,"value":181},"Phlebotomy Room","50",{"name":183,"value":184},"Rehabilitation Gym","51",{"name":186,"value":187},"Assisted Living Room","52",{"name":189,"value":190},"Pharmacy","53",{"name":192,"value":193},"Sterile Processing Dept","54",{"name":195,"value":196},"Medical Storage","55",{"name":198,"value":17,"add_value":199,"describe":200,"children":201},"Business & Public Service","business","AI is elevating commercial and public services. Our datasets span retail, dining, and service centers to improve intelligent operations.",[202,205,208,211,214,217,220,223,226,229],{"name":203,"value":204},"Shopping Mall Atrium","86",{"name":206,"value":207},"Supermarket Shelf","87",{"name":209,"value":210},"Self-Checkout Counter","88",{"name":212,"value":213},"Restaurant Dining Hall","89",{"name":215,"value":216},"Commercial Kitchen","90",{"name":218,"value":219},"Hotel Lobby","91",{"name":221,"value":222},"Subway Platform","92",{"name":224,"value":225},"Security Checkpoint","93",{"name":227,"value":228},"Underground Parking","94",{"name":230,"value":231},"Bank Teller Zone","95",{"name":233,"value":20,"add_value":234,"describe":235,"children":236},"Industrial & Manufacturing","robot-arm","AI is modernizing industry. Our datasets capture factories and logistics spaces to support robotics and intelligent manufacturing.",[237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264],{"name":238,"value":239},"Final Assembly Line","96",{"name":241,"value":242},"Quality Control Station","97",{"name":244,"value":245},"Robotic Welding Cell","98",{"name":247,"value":248},"CNC Machining Center","99",{"name":250,"value":251},"Cleanroom","100",{"name":253,"value":254},"Automated Warehouse","101",{"name":256,"value":257},"Loading Dock","102",{"name":259,"value":260},"Sorting Center","103",{"name":262,"value":263},"Chemical Plant","104",{"name":265,"value":266},"Power Substation","105",{"name":268,"value":39,"add_value":269,"describe":270,"children":271},"Transportation & Driving","car","AI is revolutionizing mobility. Our datasets capture road networks, vehicle dynamics and traffic scenarios to support autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems.",[272,275,278,281,284,287,290,293,296,299],{"name":273,"value":274},"Urban Intersection","56",{"name":276,"value":277},"Highway \u002F Expressway","57",{"name":279,"value":280},"Tunnel","58",{"name":282,"value":283},"Roundabout","59",{"name":285,"value":286},"School \u002F Hospital Zone","60",{"name":288,"value":289},"Toll Station","61",{"name":291,"value":292},"Construction Zone","62",{"name":294,"value":295},"Parking Garage","63",{"name":297,"value":298},"Driver Cabin","64",{"name":300,"value":301},"Adverse Weather","65",{"name":303,"value":42,"add_value":304,"describe":305,"children":306},"Outdoor & Construction","tent-tree","AI is optimizing outdoor operations. Our datasets capture construction sites, open-air work zones and outdoor infrastructure to support smart construction and autonomous outdoor machinery.",[307,310,313,316,319,322,325,328,331,334],{"name":308,"value":309},"Excavation Site","66",{"name":311,"value":312},"Scaffolding Area","67",{"name":314,"value":315},"Material Storage Yard","68",{"name":317,"value":318},"Site Entrance","69",{"name":320,"value":321},"Roadwork Zone","70",{"name":323,"value":324},"Bridge Infrastructure","71",{"name":326,"value":327},"Transmission Line","72",{"name":329,"value":330},"Open-pit Mine","73",{"name":332,"value":333},"Tunneling Site","74",{"name":335,"value":336},"Post-Disaster Rubble","75",{"name":338,"value":45,"add_value":339,"describe":340,"children":341},"Nature, Aerial & Aquatic","global-loop","AI is exploring the natural world. Our datasets capture terrestrial landscapes, aerial vistas and aquatic ecosystems to support environmental monitoring and autonomous exploration systems.",[342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369],{"name":343,"value":344},"Deep Forest","76",{"name":346,"value":347},"Farmland \u002F Crops","77",{"name":349,"value":350},"River \u002F Lake","78",{"name":352,"value":353},"Open Ocean","79",{"name":355,"value":356},"Underwater Coral Reef","80",{"name":358,"value":359},"Fish Farm","81",{"name":361,"value":362},"Mountain Terrain","82",{"name":364,"value":365},"Urban Low Altitude","83",{"name":367,"value":368},"Fire Scene","84",{"name":370,"value":371},"Desert \u002F Gobi","85",{"name":373,"value":48,"add_value":374,"describe":375,"children":376},"Virtul & Digital","siri","AI is reshaping the virtual realm. Our datasets capture digital twins, virtual environments and simulated spaces to support metaverse development and intelligent digital interaction.",[377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404],{"name":378,"value":379},"VR Social Space","106",{"name":381,"value":382},"Synthetic Driving Sim","107",{"name":384,"value":385},"Digital Twin City","108",{"name":387,"value":388},"FPS \u002F MOBA Game","109",{"name":390,"value":391},"Robotics Gym","110",{"name":393,"value":394},"AR Navigation","111",{"name":396,"value":397},"Virtual Showroom","112",{"name":399,"value":400},"Code \u002F IDE Interface","113",{"name":402,"value":403},"App GUI Screen","114",{"name":405,"value":406},"Synthetic Face\u002FID","115",[408,411,414,417,420,423,426,429,432,435,438],{"name":409,"value":7,"add_value":410,"describe":8},"Classification","rubric",{"name":412,"value":11,"add_value":413,"describe":8},"Detection","radar",{"name":415,"value":14,"add_value":416,"describe":8},"Segmentation","segmentation",{"name":418,"value":17,"add_value":419,"describe":8},"Tacking","crosshairs",{"name":421,"value":20,"add_value":422,"describe":8},"Estimation","streamline",{"name":424,"value":39,"add_value":425,"describe":8},"QA","qa",{"name":427,"value":42,"add_value":428,"describe":8},"Recognition","finger-scan",{"name":430,"value":45,"add_value":431,"describe":8},"Control","control",{"name":433,"value":48,"add_value":434,"describe":8},"Extraction","extraction",{"name":436,"value":51,"add_value":437,"describe":8},"Retrieval","retrieval",{"name":439,"value":54,"add_value":440,"describe":8},"Forecast","forecast",[442,445,448,451,454,457,460,463,466,469,472,475],{"name":443,"value":7,"add_value":444,"describe":8},"Audio","audio",{"name":446,"value":11,"add_value":447,"describe":8},"Image","image",{"name":449,"value":14,"add_value":450,"describe":8},"Text","text",{"name":452,"value":17,"add_value":453,"describe":8},"Video","video",{"name":455,"value":20,"add_value":456,"describe":8},"Multi","multi",{"name":458,"value":39,"add_value":459,"describe":8},"Document","document",{"name":461,"value":42,"add_value":462,"describe":8},"Time-Series","time-series",{"name":464,"value":45,"add_value":465,"describe":8},"3D cloud","cloud",{"name":467,"value":48,"add_value":468,"describe":8},"Code","code",{"name":470,"value":51,"add_value":471,"describe":8},"Event","event",{"name":473,"value":54,"add_value":474,"describe":8},"Motion","motion",{"name":476,"value":57,"add_value":477,"describe":8},"Interaction","interaction",[479,482,487,491,494,499,504,509,514,519,524,528,532,536,540,544,548,552,556,559],{"id":480,"value":480,"name":233,"intro":481,"add_value":234,"describe":481},2,"智能质检：利用图像识别、多模态模型对产品外观或声音、振动等数据进行分析，自动识别缺陷，提高质量控制效率。\n工业知识问答与文档理解：通过大模型理解和总结技术文档、操作手册，实现快速问答、知识检索和培训支持。\n安全监测与风险预警：实时分析视频、传感器和操作日志，识别潜在危险行为或异常状态，提前预警，保障人员和设备安全。",{"id":483,"value":483,"name":484,"intro":485,"add_value":486,"describe":485},3,"Finance & Insurance","风险评估与预测：分析大量客户数据，评估信用风险、市场风险等，预测违约概率、股价走势等，辅助金融机构决策。\n智能投顾：根据客户风险偏好、资产状况等，提供个性化投资组合建议，实时调整投资策略。\n反欺诈检测：通过分析交易数据、用户行为，识别异常交易和欺诈行为，保障金融安全。","funds",{"id":488,"value":488,"name":489,"intro":490,"add_value":269,"describe":490},1,"Transport & Automotive","智能座舱：打造多模态交互的 AI 座舱，通过语音、手势、面部识别等实现人机交互，如语音控制导航、音乐播放。\n驾驶员状态监测：识别疲劳、分心、抽烟、打电话等行为，通过大模型判断危险等级，触发相应提醒或干预机制。\n智能驾驶：AI 用于环境感知、路径规划与决策控制，使车辆能识别道路、行人、障碍物等，实现自适应巡航、自动泊车、车道保持等功能，提升驾驶安全性与便利性。",{"id":492,"value":492,"name":136,"intro":493,"add_value":137,"describe":493},4,"医学影像诊断：分析 CT、MRI 等影像，辅助医生检测疾病、识别病灶，如 AI 系统可快速发现肺部结节。\n医患对话助手：通过自然语言处理理解患者问题，提供初步健康建议或就诊指导，缓解医生接诊压力。\n智能健康管理：根据用户健康数据，提供个性化健康建议、疾病预警，如智能手环结合 AI 分析用户运动、睡眠、心率等数据。",{"id":495,"value":495,"name":496,"intro":497,"add_value":498,"describe":497},6,"Smart Devices","多模态交互：支持语音、手势、眼神等多种交互方式，如 AI 眼镜可通过语音指令实现翻译、搜索功能。\n智能感知与处理：使设备能感知环境、理解用户需求，如智能音箱根据环境噪音自动调节音量。\n个性化服务：根据用户使用习惯和偏好，提供个性化功能与服务，如智能手表为用户定制运动健身计划。","microscope",{"id":500,"value":500,"name":501,"intro":502,"add_value":503,"describe":502},8,"Law & Government","智能法律问答：面向公众或企业用户，提供合规、劳动法、婚姻继承、知识产权等常见法律问题的智能解答。\n合同审查与风险识别：利用大模型分析合同内容，识别潜在风险条款、漏洞或不合理约定，提升合同审核质量。\n法律知识图谱构建：自动梳理法规、案例、条文之间的引用关系，构建语义化知识图谱，支持智能分析和推理。","hammer",{"id":505,"value":505,"name":506,"intro":507,"add_value":508,"describe":507},7,"Education & Training","个性化学习：根据学生学习进度、能力和知识掌握情况，推送个性化学习内容与练习，如智能辅导系统为学生制定专属学习计划。\n智能教学辅助：AI 助教协助教师进行作业批改、答疑解惑，还可分析教学数据，为教师提供教学反馈，优化教学方法。\n虚拟学习环境：利用 AI 创建虚拟实验、历史场景等，让学生沉浸式学习，如在虚拟化学实验室中进行实验操作。","degree-hat",{"id":510,"value":510,"name":511,"intro":512,"add_value":513,"describe":512},5,"Agriculture & Food","作物病虫害识别与防治：通过图像识别分析农作物叶片、果实等症状，识别病虫害类型，给出防治建议，减少产量损失。\n农产品质量检测：利用图像和传感器数据，识别果蔬等农产品的成熟度、外观缺陷，进行自动分级，提高市场竞争力。\n农情监测与预测：利用卫星遥感、气象和传感器数据，结合大模型预测作物长势、干旱、洪涝等农情变化。","ph-farm",{"id":515,"value":515,"name":516,"intro":517,"add_value":518,"describe":517},9,"Retail & E-commerce","智能客服：通过自然语言对话理解用户需求，提供产品推荐、订单查询、退换货支持等服务，提升客户满意度。\n个性化营销推荐：基于用户浏览、购买、偏好等行为数据，生成个性化推荐内容与优惠策略，提高转化率和客单价。\n商品内容生成：自动撰写商品标题、卖点描述、使用说明等内容，适用于海量SKU的内容生产与多语言发布。","buy",{"id":520,"value":520,"name":521,"intro":522,"add_value":523,"describe":8},10,"Security & Protection",null,"safe-shield-line",{"id":525,"value":525,"name":526,"intro":522,"add_value":527,"describe":8},11,"Environment & Climate","weather",{"id":529,"value":529,"name":530,"intro":522,"add_value":531,"describe":8},12,"Energy & Resource","energy-leaf",{"id":533,"value":533,"name":534,"intro":522,"add_value":535,"describe":8},13,"Express & Logistics","speed-outline",{"id":537,"value":537,"name":538,"intro":522,"add_value":539,"describe":8},15,"Sports","baseball-outline",{"id":541,"value":541,"name":542,"intro":522,"add_value":543,"describe":8},16,"General Data","daily-booth",{"id":545,"value":545,"name":546,"intro":522,"add_value":547,"describe":8},17,"Content & Media","media",{"id":549,"value":549,"name":550,"intro":522,"add_value":551,"describe":8},18,"Construction","construction",{"id":553,"value":553,"name":554,"intro":522,"add_value":555,"describe":8},19,"IT & Telecom","tech",{"id":557,"value":557,"name":558,"intro":522,"add_value":498,"describe":8},20,"Science & Research",{"id":560,"value":560,"name":561,"intro":522,"add_value":562,"describe":8},21,"Language & Culture","lang",{"id":564,"unique_code":565,"title":566,"icon":8,"intro":567,"cate":483,"detail":568,"create_time":569,"update_time":570,"price":571,"view_count":572,"download_count":573,"unit":573,"amount":574,"is_create_order":573,"enterprise_id":488,"seo_keywords":575,"seo_description":576,"data_format":577,"file_size":578,"apply_scene":579,"training_task":580,"version":581,"dataset_type_id":492,"dataset_scene_id":510,"sample_file":8,"banner":8,"unit_name":8,"cate_name":449,"icon_url":8,"banner_url":8,"sample_file_url":8,"data_dict":582,"qa_list":624,"sample_metadatas":641,"text_sample_content":677,"enterprise_name":678,"enterprise_logo":679,"data_distribution":680},1115,"2fdf083985dbc63ebf1f955d08c788a1","Trout Feeding and Growth Causal Reasoning Question-Answer Dataset","Train models to reason about feeding changes, growth outcomes, and confounding factors in trout farming scenarios.","\u003Cp>This question-answer dataset presents trout farming records and comparison scenarios focused on how feed type, feeding amount, feeding frequency, and feeding behavior relate to growth, weight gain, and feed conversion. It guides models to assess the potential effects of feeding changes while identifying possible confounders such as water temperature, fish life stage, and rearing conditions. It is suitable for causal reasoning training, reasoning-focused supervised fine-tuning, and question-answer evaluation in trout farming contexts.\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-10 11:28:43","2026-10-19 17:18:43","0.00",32,0,5000,"trout aquaculture data, trout feeding, fish growth analysis, feed conversion, causal reasoning dataset, aquaculture question answering, reasoning SFT, aquaculture training data","Causal reasoning QA data for trout farming, analyzing feeding methods and growth outcomes while identifying confounders such as water temperature and fish life_","JSON","0.4GB","trout aquaculture management, fish growth optimization, aquaculture feeding assessment","causal reasoning, growth factor analysis, confounding factor identification","V1.0",[583,588,593,598,603,608,614,619],{"id":573,"name":584,"field":585,"intro":586,"type":587},"File Name","file_name","File name","string",{"id":589,"name":590,"field":591,"intro":592,"type":587},8094,"Source Scenario Material","source_material","Original text containing farming records, comparison scenarios, and the question to be answered.",{"id":594,"name":595,"field":596,"intro":597,"type":587},8095,"Growth Outcome Analysis","outcome_analysis","Describes observed or expected growth, weight gain, or feed conversion performance and its relationship to the feeding change.",{"id":599,"name":600,"field":601,"intro":602,"type":587},8096,"Causal Conclusion","causal_conclusion","Summarizes whether a feeding change may affect trout growth or feed conversion and indicates the direction of the assessment.",{"id":604,"name":605,"field":606,"intro":607,"type":587},8097,"Causal Uncertainty","causal_uncertainty","Describes evidence gaps, alternative explanations, or questions requiring further validation to avoid mistaking correlation for causation.",{"id":609,"name":610,"field":611,"intro":612,"type":613},8098,"Confounding Factors","confounding_factors","Lists factors that may affect both feeding conditions and growth outcomes, such as water temperature, fish life stage, or rearing conditions.","array",{"id":615,"name":616,"field":617,"intro":618,"type":587},8099,"Evidence Explanation","evidence_explanation","Explains which evidence from the farming records or comparison scenario supports or limits the causal assessment.",{"id":620,"name":621,"field":622,"intro":623,"type":587},8100,"Feeding Change Analysis","intervention_analysis","Identifies the feeding factor being evaluated, such as feed type, feeding amount, feeding frequency, or a change in feeding behavior.",[625,629,633,637],{"id":626,"question":627,"answer":628},5910,"What topics does the dataset cover?","The dataset organizes farming records and comparison scenarios as question-answer examples. It covers feed type, feeding amount and frequency, feeding behavior, growth, weight gain, and feed conversion, and asks models to reason about possible causal relationships among them.",{"id":630,"question":631,"answer":632},5911,"How does the dataset support causal reasoning training?","Examples examine changes in feeding factors and resulting outcomes, asking models to determine the direction of potential effects, explain supporting evidence, and consider possible confounders such as water temperature, fish life stage, and rearing conditions. The causal uncertainty field helps distinguish evidence-based conclusions from hypotheses that need further validation.",{"id":634,"question":635,"answer":636},5912,"What applications suit the dataset's field structure?","Its fields cover the source scenario, causal conclusion, feeding-change analysis, growth-outcome analysis, confounding factors, evidence explanation, and causal uncertainty. These fields can support reasoning-focused supervised fine-tuning, question-answer evaluation, and causal analysis workflow development. Confirm the delivered data's size, format, and quality metrics with the provider.",{"id":638,"question":639,"answer":640},5913,"How can I access the data, and what license applies?","Access methods, available formats, and licensing terms depend on the provider's product listing and license agreement. Before use, verify whether the license permits training, evaluation, modification, and commercial use, and follow any restrictions on data use or redistribution.",[642,655,666],{"id":643,"relate_table":644,"relate_id":645,"file_size":573,"file_name":8,"path":8,"duration":573,"cate":483,"file_format":8,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":646,"cate_name":647,"source_material":648,"outcome_analysis":649,"causal_conclusion":650,"causal_uncertainty":651,"confounding_factors":652,"evidence_explanation":653,"intervention_analysis":654},14746,"union_cubo",268439176,"{\"source_material\": \"Eight tanks of trout averaging about 100 g per fish were randomly assigned to two diets, with four tanks per diet, for 28 days. Diet A and Diet B were offered three times daily under the same ration-adjustment protocol. Mean water temperature was 12.2°C for Diet A tanks and 12.1°C for Diet B tanks; stocking density, water exchange, and initial mean weights were similar. No uneaten feed was recorded. Cumulative feed delivered averaged 28.0 g per fish on Diet A and 30.8 g on Diet B. Mean weight gain was 28 g per fish on Diet A and 35 g on Diet B. Feed conversion ratio, calculated as feed delivered divided by biomass gain, was 1.00 for Diet A and 0.88 for Diet B. No mortality was recorded. Question: Do these results support an effect of diet type on growth or feed conversion, and how strong is the evidence?\", \"outcome_analysis\": \"Mean gain was 35 g per fish on Diet B and 28 g on Diet A. Feed conversion ratio was 0.88 for Diet B versus 1.00 for Diet A, indicating a more favorable recorded conversion for the Diet B group over the 28-day period.\", \"causal_conclusion\": \"The results support a possible beneficial effect of Diet B under the recorded conditions: fish receiving it gained more weight and had a lower feed conversion ratio. Random assignment and similar recorded conditions strengthen the comparison, but the result does not establish that the diet difference alone explains the outcomes with certainty.\", \"causal_uncertainty\": \"The findings are consistent with a benefit from Diet B but are limited to one 28-day comparison. Differences in actual intake and unreported tank-to-tank variation could affect the results. Repeated trials with tank-level measurements would help determine whether the effect is reproducible.\", \"confounding_factors\": \"[\\\"Small differences in water temperature between groups\\\", \\\"Tank-level differences in conditions despite similar recorded husbandry\\\", \\\"Differences in cumulative feed delivered under the shared ration-adjustment protocol\\\"]\", \"evidence_explanation\": \"Random assignment, similar initial weights and husbandry conditions, and the same feeding protocol support a comparison of the diets. Both weight gain and feed conversion favored Diet B. The groups nevertheless received different cumulative amounts of feed, and the record gives no tank-level results, so it cannot show whether the group-level difference was consistent across tanks or how feed intake contributed to the outcome.\", \"intervention_analysis\": \"The intervention was diet type, with Diet A compared with Diet B. Feeding frequency and the ration-adjustment protocol were the same for both groups, although cumulative feed delivered differed.\"}","文本","Eight tanks of trout averaging about 100 g per fish were randomly assigned to two diets, with four tanks per diet, for 28 days. Diet A and Diet B were offered three times daily under the same ration-adjustment protocol. Mean water temperature was 12.2°C for Diet A tanks and 12.1°C for Diet B tanks; stocking density, water exchange, and initial mean weights were similar. No uneaten feed was recorded. Cumulative feed delivered averaged 28.0 g per fish on Diet A and 30.8 g on Diet B. Mean weight gain was 28 g per fish on Diet A and 35 g on Diet B. Feed conversion ratio, calculated as feed delivered divided by biomass gain, was 1.00 for Diet A and 0.88 for Diet B. No mortality was recorded. Question: Do these results support an effect of diet type on growth or feed conversion, and how strong is the evidence?","Mean gain was 35 g per fish on Diet B and 28 g on Diet A. Feed conversion ratio was 0.88 for Diet B versus 1.00 for Diet A, indicating a more favorable recorded conversion for the Diet B group over the 28-day period.","The results support a possible beneficial effect of Diet B under the recorded conditions: fish receiving it gained more weight and had a lower feed conversion ratio. Random assignment and similar recorded conditions strengthen the comparison, but the result does not establish that the diet difference alone explains the outcomes with certainty.","The findings are consistent with a benefit from Diet B but are limited to one 28-day comparison. Differences in actual intake and unreported tank-to-tank variation could affect the results. Repeated trials with tank-level measurements would help determine whether the effect is reproducible.","[\"Small differences in water temperature between groups\", \"Tank-level differences in conditions despite similar recorded husbandry\", \"Differences in cumulative feed delivered under the shared ration-adjustment protocol\"]","Random assignment, similar initial weights and husbandry conditions, and the same feeding protocol support a comparison of the diets. Both weight gain and feed conversion favored Diet B. The groups nevertheless received different cumulative amounts of feed, and the record gives no tank-level results, so it cannot show whether the group-level difference was consistent across tanks or how feed intake contributed to the outcome.","The intervention was diet type, with Diet A compared with Diet B. Feeding frequency and the ration-adjustment protocol were the same for both groups, although cumulative feed delivered differed.",{"id":656,"relate_table":644,"relate_id":657,"file_size":573,"file_name":8,"path":8,"duration":573,"cate":483,"file_format":8,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":658,"cate_name":647,"source_material":659,"outcome_analysis":660,"causal_conclusion":661,"causal_uncertainty":662,"confounding_factors":663,"evidence_explanation":664,"intervention_analysis":665},14745,660095486,"{\"source_material\": \"Two groups of trout, each held in four tanks, began a 21-day period at similar mean weights of 90 g and 91 g per fish. Both groups received the same feed twice daily. From day 8, the ration in one group was raised from 1.4% to 1.8% of estimated biomass per day; the comparison group remained at 1.4%. The groups were supplied by separate water lines. Temperature in the increased-ration group fell from 13.4°C to 11.2°C during the period, while the comparison group remained between 13.3°C and 13.5°C. Mean weight gain was 20 g per fish in the increased-ration group and 23 g in the comparison group. Feed delivered averaged 27 g and 25.3 g per fish, respectively; the corresponding feed conversion ratios were 1.35 and 1.10. Uneaten feed was recorded during 6 of 21 observations in the increased-ration group and 1 of 21 in the comparison group. Question: Did increasing the ration improve growth or feed conversion, and can the difference be attributed to ration alone?\", \"outcome_analysis\": \"The increased-ration group gained 20 g per fish compared with 23 g in the comparison group. Its feed conversion ratio was 1.35 compared with 1.10, so the higher ration did not coincide with better performance in these records.\", \"causal_conclusion\": \"The record does not show improved growth or feed conversion after the ration increase: the increased-ration group gained less weight and had a higher feed conversion ratio. The effect of ration cannot be isolated because temperature changed substantially in that group while remaining stable in the comparison group.\", \"causal_uncertainty\": \"The separate water lines make temperature a major alternative explanation for the poorer outcome, and the record does not establish how much feed the fish actually consumed. A comparison with matched temperature conditions and measured feed consumption would be needed to estimate the ration effect more clearly.\", \"confounding_factors\": \"[\\\"Different temperature trends between the groups, associated with their separate water lines\\\", \\\"Tank-level differences in water flow or rearing conditions\\\", \\\"Uneaten feed, which means delivered feed may not equal consumed feed\\\"]\", \"evidence_explanation\": \"The groups started at similar mean weights and received the same feed at the same frequency, while the increased-ration group received more feed. Its lower gain and higher feed conversion ratio argue against an observed performance improvement. However, its water temperature fell while the comparison temperature remained stable, so the outcome difference cannot be assigned to ration alone.\", \"intervention_analysis\": \"The evaluated change was an increase in daily ration from 1.4% to 1.8% of estimated biomass, with feed type and feeding frequency unchanged. More feed was delivered, and uneaten feed was observed more often in that group.\"}","Two groups of trout, each held in four tanks, began a 21-day period at similar mean weights of 90 g and 91 g per fish. Both groups received the same feed twice daily. From day 8, the ration in one group was raised from 1.4% to 1.8% of estimated biomass per day; the comparison group remained at 1.4%. The groups were supplied by separate water lines. Temperature in the increased-ration group fell from 13.4°C to 11.2°C during the period, while the comparison group remained between 13.3°C and 13.5°C. Mean weight gain was 20 g per fish in the increased-ration group and 23 g in the comparison group. Feed delivered averaged 27 g and 25.3 g per fish, respectively; the corresponding feed conversion ratios were 1.35 and 1.10. Uneaten feed was recorded during 6 of 21 observations in the increased-ration group and 1 of 21 in the comparison group. Question: Did increasing the ration improve growth or feed conversion, and can the difference be attributed to ration alone?","The increased-ration group gained 20 g per fish compared with 23 g in the comparison group. Its feed conversion ratio was 1.35 compared with 1.10, so the higher ration did not coincide with better performance in these records.","The record does not show improved growth or feed conversion after the ration increase: the increased-ration group gained less weight and had a higher feed conversion ratio. The effect of ration cannot be isolated because temperature changed substantially in that group while remaining stable in the comparison group.","The separate water lines make temperature a major alternative explanation for the poorer outcome, and the record does not establish how much feed the fish actually consumed. A comparison with matched temperature conditions and measured feed consumption would be needed to estimate the ration effect more clearly.","[\"Different temperature trends between the groups, associated with their separate water lines\", \"Tank-level differences in water flow or rearing conditions\", \"Uneaten feed, which means delivered feed may not equal consumed feed\"]","The groups started at similar mean weights and received the same feed at the same frequency, while the increased-ration group received more feed. Its lower gain and higher feed conversion ratio argue against an observed performance improvement. However, its water temperature fell while the comparison temperature remained stable, so the outcome difference cannot be assigned to ration alone.","The evaluated change was an increase in daily ration from 1.4% to 1.8% of estimated biomass, with feed type and feeding frequency unchanged. More feed was delivered, and uneaten feed was observed more often in that group.",{"id":667,"relate_table":644,"relate_id":668,"file_size":573,"file_name":8,"path":8,"duration":573,"cate":483,"file_format":8,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":669,"cate_name":647,"source_material":670,"outcome_analysis":671,"causal_conclusion":672,"causal_uncertainty":673,"confounding_factors":674,"evidence_explanation":675,"intervention_analysis":676},14744,399243951,"{\"source_material\": \"Eight tanks of juvenile trout with similar initial mean weights were randomly assigned to two feeding schedules, with four tanks per group. For 21 days, both groups received the same feed and the same average total allocation of 30 g per fish, divided into either two or four meals per day. Stocking density, water exchange, and dissolved oxygen were similar; water temperature averaged 12.5°C in both groups. Mean weight gain was 29.4 g per fish in the two-meal group and 31.25 g in the four-meal group. Feed conversion ratio (feed delivered divided by biomass gain) was 1.02 and 0.96, respectively. No mortality was recorded. Question: Does the feeding-frequency change appear to have affected growth or feed conversion, and what limits the conclusion?\", \"outcome_analysis\": \"Over 21 days, mean gain was 31.25 g per fish with four meals versus 29.4 g with two meals. Feed conversion ratio was also lower with four meals (0.96 versus 1.02), indicating less feed delivered per unit of biomass gain under the recorded conditions.\", \"causal_conclusion\": \"The four-meal schedule was associated with greater weight gain and a lower feed conversion ratio. Because the groups were randomly assigned and the recorded conditions were similar, the results support a possible beneficial effect of distributing the same daily feed across more meals, though they do not establish that frequency alone caused the difference with certainty.\", \"causal_uncertainty\": \"The results are consistent with a benefit from more frequent feeding, but unreported tank-level variation could contribute to the group averages. A longer replicated comparison with tank-level results would help establish whether the difference is reproducible.\", \"confounding_factors\": \"[\\\"Small differences in water temperature or dissolved oxygen among tanks despite similar recorded conditions\\\", \\\"Tank-level differences in water flow or fish distribution\\\", \\\"Short observation period and the specific juvenile growth stage\\\"]\", \"evidence_explanation\": \"Random allocation, similar initial weights and husbandry conditions, and the same average feed allocation make the frequency comparison informative. Both measured outcomes favored four meals. However, the record does not provide tank-by-tank variation or uncertainty estimates, so it is not possible to assess how consistent the differences were across replicate tanks.\", \"intervention_analysis\": \"The assessed change was feeding frequency: four meals per day instead of two, with the same feed and average total allocation per fish.\"}","Eight tanks of juvenile trout with similar initial mean weights were randomly assigned to two feeding schedules, with four tanks per group. For 21 days, both groups received the same feed and the same average total allocation of 30 g per fish, divided into either two or four meals per day. Stocking density, water exchange, and dissolved oxygen were similar; water temperature averaged 12.5°C in both groups. Mean weight gain was 29.4 g per fish in the two-meal group and 31.25 g in the four-meal group. Feed conversion ratio (feed delivered divided by biomass gain) was 1.02 and 0.96, respectively. No mortality was recorded. Question: Does the feeding-frequency change appear to have affected growth or feed conversion, and what limits the conclusion?","Over 21 days, mean gain was 31.25 g per fish with four meals versus 29.4 g with two meals. Feed conversion ratio was also lower with four meals (0.96 versus 1.02), indicating less feed delivered per unit of biomass gain under the recorded conditions.","The four-meal schedule was associated with greater weight gain and a lower feed conversion ratio. Because the groups were randomly assigned and the recorded conditions were similar, the results support a possible beneficial effect of distributing the same daily feed across more meals, though they do not establish that frequency alone caused the difference with certainty.","The results are consistent with a benefit from more frequent feeding, but unreported tank-level variation could contribute to the group averages. A longer replicated comparison with tank-level results would help establish whether the difference is reproducible.","[\"Small differences in water temperature or dissolved oxygen among tanks despite similar recorded conditions\", \"Tank-level differences in water flow or fish distribution\", \"Short observation period and the specific juvenile growth stage\"]","Random allocation, similar initial weights and husbandry conditions, and the same average feed allocation make the frequency comparison informative. Both measured outcomes favored four meals. However, the record does not provide tank-by-tank variation or uncertainty estimates, so it is not possible to assess how consistent the differences were across replicate tanks.","The assessed change was feeding frequency: four meals per day instead of two, with the same feed and average total allocation per fish.","{\"source_material\":\"Eight tanks of trout averaging about 100 g per fish were randomly assigned to two diets, with four tanks per diet, for 28 days. Diet A and Diet B were offered three times daily under the same ration-adjustment protocol. Mean water temperature was 12.2°C for Diet A tanks and 12.1°C for Diet B tanks; stocking density, water exchange, and initial mean weights were similar. No uneaten feed was recorded. Cumulative feed delivered averaged 28.0 g per fish on Diet A and 30.8 g on Diet B. Mean weight gain was 28 g per fish on Diet A and 35 g on Diet B. Feed conversion ratio, calculated as feed delivered divided by biomass gain, was 1.00 for Diet A and 0.88 for Diet B. No mortality was recorded. Question: Do these results support an effect of diet type on growth or feed conversion, and how strong is the evidence?\",\"outcome_analysis\":\"Mean gain was 35 g per fish on Diet B and 28 g on Diet A. Feed conversion ratio was 0.88 for Diet B versus 1.00 for Diet A, indicating a more favorable recorded conversion for the Diet B group over the 28-day period.\",\"causal_conclusion\":\"The results support a possible beneficial effect of Diet B under the recorded conditions: fish receiving it gained more weight and had a lower feed conversion ratio. Random assignment and similar recorded conditions strengthen the comparison, but the result does not establish that the diet difference alone explains the outcomes with certainty.\",\"causal_uncertainty\":\"The findings are consistent with a benefit from Diet B but are limited to one 28-day comparison. Differences in actual intake and unreported tank-to-tank variation could affect the results. Repeated trials with tank-level measurements would help determine whether the effect is reproducible.\",\"confounding_factors\":\"[\\\"Small differences in water temperature between groups\\\", \\\"Tank-level differences in conditions despite similar recorded husbandry\\\", \\\"Differences in cumulative feed delivered under the shared ration-adjustment protocol\\\"]\",\"evidence_explanation\":\"Random assignment, similar initial weights and husbandry conditions, and the same feeding protocol support a comparison of the diets. Both weight gain and feed conversion favored Diet B. The groups nevertheless received different cumulative amounts of feed, and the record gives no tank-level results, so it cannot show whether the group-level difference was consistent across tanks or how feed intake contributed to the outcome.\",\"intervention_analysis\":\"The intervention was diet type, with Diet A compared with Diet B. Feeding frequency and the ration-adjustment protocol were the same for both groups, although cumulative feed delivered differed.\"}","MOBIUSI INC","https:\u002F\u002Fstatic.mobiusi.com\u002Fmobiwusi\u002F20250829\u002F7bf4ac62b4533e2b809998a6f1c5491e.png?Expires=1792463130&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tH8MQqhgeiAtrzCHrxM&Signature=v6Tr8jBrdm4s5wU1SnnyGsYg%2Bhw%3D&x-oss-process=image%2Fresize%2Cm_fill%2Cw_35%2Ch_35",[681,687],{"type":682,"title":683,"count_data":684},"bar","Length distribution",[685],{"name":686,"value":483},"1k lower",{"type":688,"title":689,"count_data":690},"pie","Language distribution",[691],{"name":692,"value":483},"English"]